期刊文献+

用企业理论研究市账差的含义

Exploring Market-book Value and Intellectual Capital from a Theory-of-Firm Perspective
下载PDF
导出
摘要 使用三个较综合的企业理论:代理成本理论、战略因素市场模型和动态能力观分析了市账差的含义和在智力资本实证研究中使用的影响。不同的理论对智力资本和市账差之间的关系有着不同的看法。代理成本理论认为市账差代表了智力资本价值,差距的存在是偏差会计准则造成的,故要修改会计准则;而其他两个理论并不把差距看做问题,认为市账差并不全是智力资本,但具体分析时两个理论又各有看法。因此在进行实证研究时智力资本和市账差的含义一定要与具体企业理论相对应,企业理论能有助于更好的理解智力资本相关的问题。 This paper uses three more integrated theory of the firm: agency cost theory, strategic factor market model and dynamic-capabilities view of the firm to analyze the meaning of market-book value gap and impact of empirical research in intellectual capital. There is a different view on the relationship between intellectual capital and market-book value gap from different theory. According to agency cost theory, market-book value gap represents intellectual capital value and the gap is caused by deviation of accounting standards, so it is necessary to modify accounting standards. While according to the other two theories, market-book value gap is not seen as a problem, but the gap is not all accounted for intellectual capital value. But in specific analysis, there is their own views. Conducting empirical research, intellectual capital and meaning of market-book value gap must correspond to specific firm theory, so firm theory can contribute to a better understanding of the issues related to intellectual capital.
作者 曾洁琼 张婷
出处 《技术经济与管理研究》 CSSCI 2014年第5期48-52,共5页 Journal of Technical Economics & Management
基金 国家教育部人文社科研究项目(10YJA630007)
关键词 市账差 智力资本 代理成本 动态能力观 Intellectual capital Market-book value gap Agency costs Dynamic-capabilities view of the firm
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Dumay,J.C. Grand theories as barriers to using IC concepts [J]. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2012 : 13(1). 被引量:1
  • 2Guthrie,J.. The management, measurement and the reporting of intellectual capital [J].Journal of Intellectual Capital,2011:2(l). 被引量:1
  • 3Lev, B. and Zarowin, P.. The boundaries of financial reporting and how to extend them [J].Journal of Accounting Research, 1999,37. 被引量:1
  • 4Mouritsen, J., Larsen, H.T. and Bukh, P.N.D.. Valuing the future: intellectual capital supplements at Skandia [J].Accounting, Audit- ing & Accountability Journal, 2011 : 14(4). 被引量:1
  • 5Walker, R.G., Discussion of Lev, Radhakrishnan and Zhang [J]. Abacus, 2009,45(3). 被引量:1
  • 6Miller, M.H.. Behavioral rationality in finance: the case of divide- nds [J].The Journal of Business, 1986:59(4). 被引量:1
  • 7Jensen, M.C. and Meckling, W.H.. Theory of the firm: managerial behavior,agency costs and ownership structure [J].Journal of Fin- ancial Economics, 1976:3(4). 被引量:1
  • 8Marzo, G.. Ambiguities, dualities and metaphors in intellectual c- apital research and practice. Some open questions [C].Grenoble: the 8th Interdisciplinary Workshop On Intangibles, Intellectual Capital & Extra-Financial Information, 2012. 被引量:1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部