摘要
以500名在校大学生为研究对象,采用社会支持评定量表、应对方式问卷和总体幸福感量表进行问卷调查,探讨大学生社会支持、应对方式与主观幸福感的关系,并检验应对方式的中介效应.结果显示:(1)社会支持在性别、年级差异上均无统计学意义;应对各因子性别差异无统计学意义,解决问题、自责、幻想、退避四个应对因子存在显著年级差异;主观幸福感得分男生显著高于女生,并存在显著年级差异.(2)社会支持与主观幸福感呈显著正相关;解决问题、求助两个应对因子与主观幸福感呈显著正相关,自责、幻想、退避、合理化四个应对因子与主观幸福感呈显著负相关.(3)社会支持对主观幸福感有明显的直接效应(β=0.289,P<0.001),而且应对方式中介效应也显著(β=0.197,β=-0.366,P<0.001),其中成熟应对方式中介效应占总效应的29.7%,不成熟应对方式中介效应占总效应的18.9%.
A survey was carried out on 500college students through Social Support Rating Scale, Coping Style Questionnaire and General Well-being Rating Scale and a discussion was organized to talk about the relationship of social support,coping style and subjective well-being of college students in order to examine the mediation effect of coping style.The results show：（1）Social support has no statistical meaning in gender and grade difference,gender difference of coping factors has no statistical meaning,the four coping factors including problem solving,self-blame,illusion and avoidance differ significantly in grade,boy students score much higher in subjective well-being than girl students and there is significant discrepancies between different grades.（2）Social support has significant positive correlation with subjective well-being;problem solving and help seeking have significant positive correlation with subjective well-being,self-blame,and illusion,avoidance,and rationalization has significant negative correlation with subjective well-being.（3）Social support has evident direct effect on subjective well-being（β=0.289,P 0.001）and the mediation effect of coping style is significant（β=0.197,β=-0.366,P 0.001）,of which mediation effect of mature coping style accounts for 29.7% of the overall effect while mediation effect of immature coping style accounts for 18.9%.
出处
《湖州师范学院学报》
2014年第4期83-88,共6页
Journal of Huzhou University
基金
广东省哲学社科"十二五"规划2013年度学科共建项目(GD13XXL04)
关键词
大学生
社会支持
应对方式
主观幸福感
中介作用
college students
social support
coping style
subjective well-being
mediation effect
