期刊文献+

后腹腔镜下肾部分切除治疗早期肾癌不同术式的比较 被引量:10

Comparison of different surgical treatment of retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for patients with localized renal cell carcinoma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨后腹腔镜下肾部分切除术( RLPN)的不同术式治疗早期肾癌的有效性及安全性。方法回顾性分析2006年2月至2012年12月我院收治的肿瘤最大径<4cm,并行RLPN的肾癌患者127例。分为4组,传统组( n=44)以传统肾肿瘤剜除术治疗,假包膜组( n=35)为单纯沿肿瘤假包膜切除肿瘤,免打结组( n=39)为沿肿瘤假包膜切除肿瘤并采用免打结缝合修补肾脏组织缺损,选择性阻断组( n=9)在免打结技术的基础上对肾动脉选择性阻断并切断肿瘤血供。比较前3组肾蒂血管阻断时间、手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院天数、术中输血率及术后尿漏发生率。结果3组的肾蒂血管阻断时间分别为(32.07±5.59)min、(30.20±5.84)min、(27.31±6.17)min,差异有统计学意义(P=0.002);3组的手术时间分别为(109.68±20.07)min、(106.20±16.32)min、(97.00±17.65)min,差异有统计学意义(P=0.007);3组的术中出血量分别为(106.93±72.26)ml、(80.26±49.57)ml、(54.23±36.32)ml,差异有统计学意义(P=0.000);3组的术后住院天数分别为(7.82±1.42)d、(6.31±1.69)d、(5.97±1.51)d,差异有统计学意义(P=0.000);3组术中输血率分别为2.3%(1/44)、0(0/35)及0(0/39),差异无统计学意义( P>0.05);3组术后尿漏发生率分别为0(0/44)、2.9%(1/35)及2.6%(1/39),差异无统计学意义( P>0.05)。术后随访14~60个月,127例患者均无复发或转移。结论对于较小的肾癌,沿包膜剜除肾肿瘤及术中免打结技术的应用明显缩短了肾动脉的阻断时间及术中出血量。同时,选择性肾动脉阻断技术的应用将有望摆脱肾蒂阻断时间及热缺血时间的限制,值得进一步研究。 Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of different surgical treatment of retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial ne-phrectomy for patients with localized renal cell carcinoma. Methods 127 patients with tumor size<4cm underwent RLPN from February 2006 to December 2012 in our hospital. According to the course of the new surgical techniques adopted, they were divided into 4 groups:conven-tional group(n=44), simple enucleation group(n=35), knot-free suture group(n=39)and selective artery clamping group(n=9). The data of operative time, renal artery clamping time, blood loss during operation, postoperative hospital stay, intraoperative transfusion rate and the incidence of urinary leakage postoperation were collected, and those data of the former three groups were statistical analyzed. Results The mean time of renal artery clamping in the former three groups was(32?07±5?59)min,(30?20±5?84)min,(27?31±6?17)min,respectively. The mean operative time were(109?68±20?07)min,(106?20±16?32)min,(97?00±17?65)min,respectively. The mean blood loss during operation was(106?93±72?26)ml,(80?26±49?57)ml,(54?23±36?32)ml,respectively. The mean time of postoperative hospital stay was(7?82±1?42)d, (6?31±1?69)d,(5?97±1?51)d, respectively. There were statistically differences between the three groups on the time of renal artery clam-ping, the operative time, the blood loss and the time of postoperative hospital stay(P<0?05). The rate of transfusion during operation was 2?3%(1/44), 0(0/35), 0(0/39), respectively. The incidence of urinary leakage after operation was 0(0/44), 2?9%(1/35), 2?6%(1/39). The above clinical parameters had no significant differences among the three groups(P>0?05). All the patients were followed up for 14-60 months, and no recurrence and metastasis was found.
出处 《临床肿瘤学杂志》 CAS 2014年第4期338-341,共4页 Chinese Clinical Oncology
基金 国家自然基金资助面上项目(30970835)
关键词 肾癌 后腹腔镜 肾部分切除术 选择性肾动脉阻断 Renal cell carcinoma Retroperitoneal laparoscopic Partial nephrectomy Selective renal artery clamping
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献55

共引文献128

同被引文献90

  • 1潘寿华,汪朔,徐刚,吴刚峰,阎家峻.后腹腔入路与经腹入路腹腔镜下肾癌根治术的临床比较[J].中国内镜杂志,2008,14(10):1076-1078. 被引量:6
  • 2陈杰,徐必友,徐丹枫,崔心刚,高轶,任吉忠,姚亚成.新型双向倒钩免打结缝合线在肾门部肿瘤腹腔镜下肾部分切除术中的应用[J].微创泌尿外科杂志,2014,3(2):84-87. 被引量:14
  • 3郭旭东,王翰博,任祥斌,李关彬,金讯波,蒋绍博.非阻断肾动脉腹腔镜肾部分切除术治疗T_(1a)期肾癌的临床研究[J].泌尿外科杂志(电子版),2014,6(2):11-14. 被引量:7
  • 4Xie C, Schwarz EM, Sampson ER,et al. Unique angiogenic andvasculogenic properties of renal cell carcinoma in a xenograftmodel of bone metastasis are associated with high levels of vegf-a and decreased ang-1 expression[J]. J Orthop Res,2012 ,30(2):325-333. 被引量:1
  • 5Hlavkova D,Kopeck y 0.Lukesova S,et al. Monitoring of serumlevels of angiogenin,ENA-78 and GRO chemokines in patientswith renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in the course of the treatment[J]. Acta Medica CHradec Kralove),2008,51(3) : 185-190. 被引量:1
  • 6KLATTE T, FICARRA V, GRATZKE C, et al. A literature review of renal surgical anatomy and surgical strategies for partial nephrectomy[J]. Eur Urol, 2015, 68(6): 980-992. 被引量:1
  • 7NG C K, GILL I S, PATIL M B, et al. Anatomic renal artery branch microdissection to facilitate zero-ischemia partial nephrectomy[J]. Eur Urol, 2012, 61(1): 67-74. 被引量:1
  • 8DESAI M M, DE CASTRO ABREU A L, LESLIE S, et al. Robotic partial nephrectomy with superselective versus main artery clamping: a retrospective comparison[J]. Eur Urol, 2014, 66(4): 713-719. 被引量:1
  • 9SIMONE G, GILL I S, MOTTRIE A, et al. Indications, techniques, outcomes, and limitations for minimally ischemic and off-clamp partial nephrectomy: a systematic review of the literature[J]. Eur Urol, 2015, 68(4): 632-640. 被引量:1
  • 10GINGRAS K, ZARUBY J, MAUL D. Comparison of V-LocTM 180 wound closure device and QuillTM PDO knotless tissue-closure device for intradermal closure in a porcine in vivo model: evaluation of biomechanical wound strength[J]. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 2012, 100(4): 1053-1058. 被引量:1

引证文献10

二级引证文献72

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部