期刊文献+

锁骨钩钢板复位固定急性肩锁关节脱位:是否需同时修复喙锁韧带? 被引量:13

Clavicular hook plates for acute acromioclavicular dislocations:simultaneous repair of coracoclavicular ligament?
下载PDF
导出
摘要 背景:近年来,锁骨钩钢板被广泛应用于治疗肩锁关节脱位,但对术中是否同时修复喙锁韧带,存在一定争议。目的:评价锁骨钩钢板治疗RockwoodⅢ、Ⅴ型急性肩锁关节脱位的临床疗效及MRI表现,探讨术中修复喙锁韧带的必要性。方法:纳入RockwoodⅢ、Ⅴ型急性肩锁关节脱位患者44例,采用锁骨钩钢板治疗,不修复喙锁韧带,所有病例均接受再次手术取出锁骨钩钢板。内固定钢板取出24个月后,通过X射线片测量双侧喙锁间隙,进行双侧肩关节Costant评分,通过MRI观察喙锁韧带愈合情况。结果与结论:39例(89%)获得随访,随访时间为(36.9±3.1)个月(30-45个月),锁骨钩钢板在体内存留时间为(12.9±3.1)个月(6-21个月)。健侧喙锁间隙平均为(6.04±1.21)mm(4.3-8.8 mm),患侧平均为(5.09±1.18)mm(3.4-7.8 mm),差异无显著性意义(P>0.05)。健侧Costant评分平均为(98.9±1.2)分(96-100分),患侧平均(96.7±3.4)分(90-100分),差异无显著性意义(P>0.05)。除1例发生肩锁关节再脱位外,其余38例MRI扫描均显示喙锁韧带已愈合,有连续的瘢痕组织形成。证实锁骨钩钢板治疗RockwoodⅢ、Ⅴ型急性肩锁关节脱位的临床疗效满意,术中不需修复喙锁韧带,MRI提示喙锁韧带在未进行手术修复的情况下可达到瘢痕愈合。 BACKGROUND:Clavicular hook plates have been used widely to treat acromioclavicular dislocations in recent years. However, it remains controversial whether coracoclavicular ligament should be repaired during the surgery. OBJECTIVE:To study the clinical effect and MRI manifestations after treatment of type III and V acute acromioclavicular Rockwood dislocation with clavicular hook plate, and to discuss the necessity of repairing coracoclavicular ligament during the surgery. METHODS:A total of 44 patients with type III and V acute acromioclavicular Rockwood dislocations were treated with clavicular hook plates without repair of coracoclavicular ligaments, and underwent plate removal operations later. At 24 months after the second surgery, X-rays were taken to measure the width of coracoclavicular joints in both normal and affected limbs, Constant-Murley scores were calculated in both sides, and MR images were used to observe the healing of coracoclavicular ligaments. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:39 patients (89%) were fol owed up for 36.9±177;3.1 months (range, 30 to 45 months). The mean duration for retaining clavicular hook plates was 12.9±177;3.1 months (range, 6 to 21 months). The mean width of coracoclavicular joints was 6.04±1.21 mm (range, 4.3 to 8.8 mm) in normal limb, while 5.09±177;1.18 mm (range, 3.4 to 7.8 mm) in affected side without significant difference (P〉0.05). The mean Constant-Murley score was 98.9±177;1.2 (range, 96 to 100) in normal limb, while 96.7±177;3.4 (range, 90 to 100) in affected side without significant difference (P>0.05). MRI showed healing of the coracoclavicular ligaments and the presence of continuous scar tissue in 38 patients, excluding one patient with recurrence of acromioclavicular joint dislocation. The clinical effects after treatment of type III and V acute acromioclavicular Rockwood dislocation with clavicular hook plate are satisfactory, and it is unnecessary to repair coracoclavicular ligament during th
出处 《中国组织工程研究》 CAS CSCD 2014年第17期2691-2696,共6页 Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research
关键词 植入物 骨科植入物 锁骨钩钢板 肩锁关节 脱位 ROCKWOOD Ⅲ型 ROCKWOOD Ⅴ型 内固定 临床疗效 磁共振成像 clavicle acromioclavicular joint dislocations internal fixators ligaments
  • 相关文献

参考文献31

  • 1Warth R J, Martetschlger F, Gaskill TR, et al. Acromioclavicular joint separations. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2013;6(1 ):71-78. 被引量:1
  • 2Ha AS, Petscavage-Thomas JM, Tagoylo GH. Acremioclavicular joint: the other joint in the shoulder. A JR Am J Roentgenol. 2014;202(2):375-385. 被引量:1
  • 3Kim AC, Matcuk G, Patel D, et al. Acromioclavicular joint injuries and reconstructions: a review of expected imaging findings and potential complications. Emerg Radiol. 2012; 19(5):399-413. 被引量:1
  • 4Beitzel K, Cote MP, Apostolakos J, et al. Current concepts in the treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocations. Arthroscopy. 2013;29(2):387-397. 被引量:1
  • 5Willimon SC, Gaskill TR, Millett PJ. Acromioclavicular joint injuries: anatomy, diagnosis, and treatment. Phys Sportsmed 2011 ;39(1 ):116-122. 被引量:1
  • 6Eschler A, Gradl G, Gierer P, et al. Hook plate fixation for acromioclavicular joint separations restores coracoclavicular distance more accurately than PDS augmentation, however presents with a high rate of acromial osteolysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2012;132(1):33-39. 被引量:1
  • 7Smith TO, Chester R, Pearse EO, et al. Operative versus non-operative management following Rockwood grade III acromioclavicular separation: a meta-analysis of the current evidence base. J Orthop Traumatol. 2011 ;12(1 ): 19-27. 被引量:1
  • 8Trainer G, Arciero RA, Mazzocca AD. Practical management of grade III acromioclavicular separations. Clin J Sport Med. 2008; 18(2): 162-166. 被引量:1
  • 9Gstettner C, Taubor M, Hitzl W, et al. Rockwood type III acremioclavicular dislocation: surgical versus conservative treatment. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008;17(2):220-225. 被引量:1
  • 10刘松,秦士吉,张英泽.肩锁关节脱位的手术治疗进展[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2013,15(4):349-351. 被引量:19

二级参考文献168

共引文献204

同被引文献115

引证文献13

二级引证文献59

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部