期刊文献+

动态竞争并购下的竞价策略选择和进入时机确定 被引量:12

Bidding strategies and entry timing in the dynamic competitive mergers and acquisitions
原文传递
导出
摘要 通过建立包含序贯进入阶段和竞价阶段的动态竞争并购模型,分析了不确定竞争环境和不完全信息条件下的主并企业竞争并购策略,重点求解了均衡状态下竞价阶段的最优竞价策略,序贯进入阶段后进入主并企业的进入决策、先进入主并企业的初始报价策略和进入时机.研究表明,先进入的主并企业可以通过抢占式报价阻止竞争对手进入并购竞争,且存在随机冲击的一段区间,使其可以单方并购目标企业.通过把模型扩展到进入顺序内生情形,确定了主并企业抢先进入的必要条件,并对主并企业的最优竞争并购策略及其相应的并购期权价值进行了求解.结论表明,抢先进入威胁将加速并购的发生,并且竞争主并企业之间进入成本差异越小,并购竞争越激烈. The paper investigates the acquirers' competitive strategies under the scenario of uncertainty and incomplete information by building the dynamic competitive M&A model incorporating both sequential entering and bidding phase. The key points of the paper are the solutions in equilibrium for optimal strategies in bidding phase and the optimal entering decisions for the following acquirers, the best initial offering and entry timing for the leading acquirers in the sequential entry phase. The final results show that the leading acquirers can exclusively acquire the target through preemptive offer to prevent other competitors which may lead to a span of random shock. Through the extension of the model to the condition that the entry order is endogenous, the paper proposes the prerequisites for the acquirers' preemptive strategy and the solutions for the acquirers' optimal competitive strategies and the value of relevant M&A options. The paper concludes that the threat of preemptive strategy will accelerate the realization of M&A and that the less discrepancy of entering cost among acquirers leads to the more M&A competition.
出处 《系统工程理论与实践》 EI CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2014年第5期1110-1121,共12页 Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice
基金 国家自然科学基金(70973096) 陕西省高校重点学科专项资金建设项目(107-5X1202) 西安理工大学校博士启动金(107-211304)
关键词 动态竞争并购 竞价策略 进入时机 不确定环境 不完全信息 dynamic competitive mergers and acquisitions bidding strategies entry timing uncertain environment incomplete information
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Fishman M J.A theory of preemptive takeover bidding[J].RAND Journal of Economics,1988,19:88-101. 被引量:1
  • 2Hirshleifer D,Png I P L.Facilitation of competing bids and the price of a takeover target[J].Review of Financial Studies,1989,2(4):587-606. 被引量:1
  • 3Dasgupta S,Tsui K.A "matching auction" for targets with heterogeneous bidders[J].Journal of Financial Intermediation,2003,12(4):331-364. 被引量:1
  • 4Prokop J.Conditional versus unconditional bidding in takeovers[J].Research in Economics,2003,57(2):123-149. 被引量:1
  • 5Dodonova A,Khoroshilov Y.Jump bidding in takeover auctions[J].Economics Letters,2006,92(3):339-341. 被引量:1
  • 6Khoroshilov Y,Dodonova A.Takeover auctions with actively participating targets[J].The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance,2007,47(2):293-311. 被引量:1
  • 7Che Y K,Lewis T R.The role of lockups in takeover contests[J].RAND Journal of Economics,2007,38(3):648-669. 被引量:1
  • 8At C,Morand P H.Jump bidding in ascending auctions:The case of takeover contests[J].Economics Letters,2008,99(3):458-460. 被引量:1
  • 9扈文秀,张涛,章伟果.不完全信息条件下象征式竞购合谋的均衡策略分析[J].系统工程,2011,29(1):45-50. 被引量:7
  • 10Smit H T J.Acquisition strategies as option games[J].Journal of Applied Corporate Finance,2001,14(2):79-89. 被引量:1

二级参考文献34

共引文献47

同被引文献160

引证文献12

二级引证文献59

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部