摘要
新古典经济学和经济史学分别源自英国古典政治经济学的演绎学派和历史学派。二者的分歧早已出现,长期以来其差异性观点和多元化方法的竞争,共同促进了政治经济学的发展。20世纪初,双方的激烈竞争导致学科分裂,也影响了二者的发展。成为主流的新古典经济学因过度演绎和脱离现实而备受批评,经济史学也逐渐淡化了历史学派面向现实的研究传统。厘清上述发展历程,有助于深入理解经济史学的意义和新古典经济学所存在问题的根源,进而推动经济史学回归历史经济学的传统,促进经济学和经济史学的良好互动与健康发展。
Neoclassical economics and economic history originated in the deductive school and the historical school of classical British political economy respectively.Disagreements between the two occurred early on.For a long time the competition between the'otherness'of their views and the multiplicity of their methods acted together to promote the development of political economy.In the early 20 th century,the fierce contest between them split the discipline,affecting the development of both.Neoclassical economics,which had become the mainstream,has been extensively criticized because of its excessive reliance on deduction and departure from reality,and economic history has also gradually weakened the historical school's traditional focus on the real world.A clear grasp of the course of their development helps us gain a deeper understanding of the significance of economic history and the source of the problems of neoclassical economics,encouraging economic history to return to the tradition of historical economics.Such an understanding promotes a virtuous interaction between economics and economic history and encourages their healthy development.
出处
《中国社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第4期45-65,205,共21页
Social Sciences in China
基金
中央高校基本科研业务费专项(NKZXB10037)
广义虚拟经济研究专项(GX2012-1010)的研究成果
中国特色社会主义经济协同创新中心的支持
