摘要
阐述了美国学者莱昂对自然书写、默菲对自然取向的文学及斯洛维克对环境文学的三种分类方法,分析并比较了三种方法的优缺点。莱昂的分类指出了自然书写的多样性,但所涉及的文本范围比较狭窄,只限于自然书写;默菲的分类所涵盖的文本范围在莱昂的基础上有很大扩展,包括了小说和诗歌,但其分类标准复杂;斯洛维克的分类因为涵盖全面、便于操作而成为美国学界普遍认同的分类方法。
This paper compares Lyon＇s taxonomy of nature writing, Murphy＇s taxonomy of nature-oriented literature and Slovic＇s taxonomy of environmental literature by analyzing the pros and cons of them. Lyon points out the variet- ies of nature writing but his taxonomy is only limited to the texts of nature writing. Murphy＇s taxonomy includes po- ems and fictions, but is very complex. Slovic＇s taxonomy, practical and comprehensive, is widely accepted.
出处
《南京林业大学学报（人文社会科学版）》
2014年第1期95-101,共7页
Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Humanities and Social Sciences Edition)
关键词
自然书写
自然取向的文学
环境文学
分类
nature writing
nature-oriented literature
environmental literature
taxonomy
