摘要
目的观察与探讨高压氧、负压吸引联合治疗各型糖尿病足的治疗效果。方法本文选择了2012年1月至2013年1月来我院治疗的糖尿病足患者50例,将其随机分为观察组与对照组,每组各25例,对照组患者接受控制血糖、清创以及换药等传统治疗方法,观察组在传统治疗方法基础上辅助使用高压氧、负压吸引联合治疗,结合下肢血管多普勒检测与血液流变学检测对疗效进行评价,并观察两组患者的治疗效果。结果与对照组相比,在高压氧、负压吸引联合治疗后,观察组患者的血液黏度明显下降(P<0.05),下肢血管的血流速度显著加快(P<0.05),此外,治疗效果也明显优于对照组(P<0.05)。结论高压氧、负压吸引联合治疗糖尿病足效果良好,值得临床推广使用。
Objective To compare the effects of hyperbaric oxygenation（HBO） combine vacuum aspiration and routine therapy on diabetic foot. Methods 50 cases with ectopic pregnancy from January 2012 to January 2013 were randomly divided into two groups, observation group and control group, and 25 cases in each. All patients were treated by routine therapy, patients in the observation group given hyperbaric oxygenation （HBO） combine vacuum aspiration. By means of hemorrheology and electromyograghy （EMG）, and the color Doppler ultrasonograghy of lower extremities for detection of the microcirculation states of lower limbs, iffty patients with diabetic foot were assessed. Results Compare with the control group, in the observation group, all of patients showed that the abnormalities in hemorrheologic, EMG parameters, and the arteria lesions as revealed by Doppler ultrasonograghy were more improved. The treatment effect of observation group is superior than control group, and there were signiifcant differences between the two groups（P〈0.05）. Conclusion The methods of hyperbaric oxygenation combine vacuum aspiration can improved the effects, and it is worthy of clinical application.
出处
《中国医药指南》
2014年第11期36-37,共2页
Guide of China Medicine
关键词
糖尿病足
高压氧
负压吸引
Diabetic foot
Hyperbaric oxygenation
Vacuum aspiration
