期刊文献+

水泥窑尾旁路放风余热发电两种技术比较☆ 被引量:2

Two kiln end by-pass waste heat power generation technologies and the comparsion
下载PDF
导出
摘要 旁路放风利于窑的稳定生产和熟料质量的提高,但会带来熟料热耗和料耗增加及环境污染等众多问题,而对旁路放风进行余热发电回收热量,则可有效降低其危害。简要介绍了旁路放风余热发电的二种技术方案——单独设置旁路放风PH余热锅炉和旁路放风与窑尾废气共用SP余热锅炉;并详细进行了这二种技术方案的分析与对比,包括共同目标与共性问题,技术不同点,配置后的操作调整,以及适用范围和经济性。 By-pass system is benefit for kiln's stable production and clinker quality, but will bring many problems as heat and material consumption increasing and environmental pollution, and recovery of by-pass heat in waste heat power generation system can reduce the harm effectively. Two technical schemes of by-pass waste heat power generation a separate set of by-pass PH waste heat boiler and a SP waste heat boiler shared by-pass air and kiln end waste gas, were intorduced in brief. A detail analysis and comparsion of the two schemes were given including common goals and problems, technical difference, operation adjustment and the adapting scope and economy.
作者 唐金泉
出处 《水泥工程》 CAS 2014年第2期54-56,共3页 Cement Engineering
关键词 旁路放风 余热发电 旁路PH余热锅炉 窑尾S P余热锅炉 技术分析 by-pass waste heat power generation by-pass PH waste heat boiler kiln end SP waste heat boiler technical analysis
  • 相关文献

同被引文献6

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部