摘要
水貂毛皮具有很高的经济价值,市售毛皮产品中经常出现以黄狼(黄鼠狼)、河狸(海狸)、麝鼠(青根貂)毛皮来仿冒水貂毛皮的现象,令普通消费者甚至专业人士很难通过感官区分。本文借助现代分析仪器,利用扫描电镜法(SEM)观察水貂、黄狼、河狸、麝鼠毛皮绒毛的鳞片层特征;利用纤维细度仪法(FFI)观察这四种动物毛皮绒毛的内部超微结构。结果表明:通过扫描电镜分析可以有效区分水貂与河狸、水貂与麝鼠的毛皮,但由于黄狼和水貂均属于食肉目鼬科,其绒毛的鳞片形态基本一致,无法被有效区分;通过纤维细度仪分析可以有效区分水貂与黄狼、水貂与河狸的毛皮,但水貂和麝鼠绒毛有部分形态一致,也无法被有效区分。因此,在实际鉴别过程中,使用两种方法互为佐证,可作为水貂毛皮材质鉴定依据。
As mink fur has high economic value, it is often appeared that commercially available fur is counterfeited with weasel, beaver （Castor） and muskrat （Qing Gendiao） fur, which is very difficult for consumers even professionals to distinguish through the senses. In this paper, by means of modern analysis instruments, scanning electron microscopy （SEM） was used to observe scale characteristics of mink, weasel, beaver, muskrat fur; the fiber fineness instrument （FFI） was used to observe internal uhrastructure of mink, weasel, beaver, muskrat fur. The results showed that： scanning electron microscope analysis could effectively distinguish the mink and beaver fur, mink and muskrat fur; but as the weasel and mink belong to the same carnivores Mustelidae, the downy flake morphology were basically the same, and their furs could not be effectively distinguished. The fiber fineness instrument analysis could effectively distinguish the mink and weasel fur, mink and beaver fur ; but the mink and muskrat villous morphology were partly consistent, and their furs could not be effectively distinguished. Therefore, in the actual identification process, the two kinds of methods are corroborated each other, which can be used as the material basis for the identification of mink fur.
出处
《皮革与化工》
CAS
2014年第2期31-34,共4页
Leather And Chemicals
关键词
仿水貂毛皮
形态特征
微观结构
鉴别方法
imitation mink fur
morphology
microstructure
identification method
