摘要
谭家健《〈穀梁传〉叙事比论》以记得事详便是优点,似乎记得事详就等于文学性强,这是偏见,文学性是由多种因素构成和影响的一个复杂的系统,绝不能仅仅以记得事详或写的字多为唯一判断标准。《春秋穀梁传》之宋楚泓之战、晋杀阳处父、楚屈完对齐桓公、柏举之战、殽之战之文学性明显优于《左传》之记载。
It is a bias that narrative of Chun-qiu-gu-liang-zhuan by Tian Jiajian had more description,more literature. Literature is made up of many factors and literature is a complicated system.More details or more written words could not be thought as the only criterion of literature.The fight of Hong, Killing Yang Chufu,Qu Wan answering Duke Qihuan, The fight of Boju, The fight of Yao of Chun-qiu-gu-liang-zhuan are better than those of Zuo-zhuan in literature.
出处
《江西教育学院学报》
2014年第1期126-131,共6页
Journal of Jiangxi Institute of Education
关键词
《穀梁传》
《左传》
《公羊传》
文学性
Chun-qiu-gu-liang-zhuan, Zuo-zhuan, Gong-yang-zhuan, literature
