摘要
951名深圳大学生使用 SEEQ问卷的中译本对教师进行教学效果评价。其中 141名大学生评价“好”与“差”教师的教学，并以此与 844名香港大学生的测试结果进行比较。结果表明， SEEQ问卷具有较好的适用性；深港两地学生对有效教学评价标准的认同比较一致，主要体现在教学热情和教学组织，但在学科价值、上课活力与风趣、做笔记与教学水平的关系的认同程度上略有差异。
951 Shenzhen University students are asked to use the Chinese version of SEEQ instrument to evaluate the teaching effectiveness of their teachers. Among them, 141 are asked to evaluate the teaching of“ good” and“ bad” teachers. The evaluation result is compared with that of 844 Hong Kong University students. It is found that the SEEQ instrument is good in applicability. Shenzhen students are well identified with Hong Kong students in evaluation standards of effective teaching, concentrating on teaching enthusiasm and teaching organization. However, When it comes to the relationship between subject values, class dynamics and humor, note taking and teaching standards, there are slight differences among the students of the two regions.
出处
《深圳大学学报（人文社会科学版）》
北大核心
2001年第1期116-121,共6页
Journal of Shenzhen University：Humanities & Social Sciences
基金
全国教育科学"九五"规划重点课题"面向 21世纪人才培养的高等学校教育评估研究" !(99018)
