期刊文献+

基于FOWGA算子的建设工程交易模式决策研究 被引量:5

Research on project delivery systems decision method based on FOWGA operator
下载PDF
导出
摘要 选择恰当的交易模式是决定一个工程项目是否取得成功的关键因素之一.将模糊集理论引入到建设工程交易模式的决策中,通过利用模糊有序加权几何平均算子在一定程度上降低了判断信息集结过程中的丢失,提高了群决策的客观公正性的特点,提出了建设工程交易模式的决策方法和步骤,并对提出的工程交易模式选择方法进行演示.结果表明,该方法克服了当前工程建设交易模式选择方法中存在的主观性大的不足,较好地解决了决策专家信息在集结过程中的丢失问题,能够客观的反映工程交易模式的排序,提高群体决策的效率. Appropriate transaction model is one of the key factors affecting a project success .This paper presents the fuzzy set theory. The judgment information loss can be reduced to a certain extent by using the fuzzy ordered weighted geometric averaging operator. Considering the characteristic of the operator that can improve the objectivity and fairness of group decision-making, this paper applies the operator into the decision methods of project delivery. Also, this paper proposes the method and procedure for the decision methods of project delivery and the mode selection method is demonstrated. Numeric examples are introduced to illustrate the application of the method, which has shown that the method can overcome the current drawback of subjectivity of the project delivery decision method, and reflect objectively the priority of the project delivery systems which help improve the efficiency of the group decision.
作者 刘迅 王卓甫
出处 《西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版)》 CSCD 北大核心 2014年第1期56-63,70,共9页 Journal of Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology(Natural Science Edition)
基金 国家社会科学基金项目(06BJY085) 江南大学青年基金项目(JUSRP1031)
关键词 工程交易模式 有序加权平均算子 三角模糊数 决策方法 project delivery systems OWA operator triangular fuzzy number decision method
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1陈勇强,焦俊双.工程项目交易方式与支付方式对项目成本的影响[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2011,39(9):1407-1412. 被引量:9
  • 2陈勇强,张雯.工程项目交易方式生产效率比较研究[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2013,41(2):309-316. 被引量:4
  • 3KENT D, BECERIK-GERBER B. Understanding construction industry experience and attitudes toward integrated project delivery[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2010, 136(8): 815-825. 被引量:1
  • 4SWARUP L, KORKMAZ S, RILEY D. Project delivery metrics for sustainable, high-performance buildings[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2011, 137(12): 1043-1051. 被引量:1
  • 5MOLLAOGLU-KORKMAZ S, SWARUP L, RILEY D. Delivering sustainable, high-performance buildings: influence of project delivery methods on integration and project outcomes[J]. Journal of Management in Engineering, 2013, 29(1): 71-78. 被引量:1
  • 6ALHAZMI T, MCCAFFER R. Project procurement system selection model[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2000, 126(3): 176-184. 被引量:1
  • 7Mahdi I M, Alreshaid K. Decision support system for selecting the proper project delivery method using analytical hierarchy process (AHP) [J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2005, 23(7): 564-572. 被引量:1
  • 8MAFAKHERI F, DAI L, SLEZAK D, et al. Project delivery system selection under uncertainty: multicriteria multilevel decision aid model[J]. Journal of Management in Engineering, 2007, 23(4): 200-206. 被引量:1
  • 9CHAN Caroline T W. Fuzzy procurement selection model for construction projects[J]. Construction Management and Economics, 2007, 25 (6): 611-618. 被引量:1
  • 10MOSTAFAVI A, KARAMOUZ M. Selecting appropriate project delivery system: fuzzy approach with risk analysis[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2010, 136(8): 923-930. 被引量:1

二级参考文献46

  • 1王金祥,吴育华.生产前沿面理论的产生及发展[J].哈尔滨商业大学学报(自然科学版),2005,21(3):382-386. 被引量:18
  • 2Reina P,Tulacz G. The 2009 top 225 international contractors and top 225 global contractors. [R]. New York.. Engineering News Record, 2009. 被引量:1
  • 3American Society of Civil Engineers. Quality in the constructed project: a guide for owners, designers and contractors[M]. 2nd ed. Virginia:ASCE Publications, 2000. 被引量:1
  • 4Ibbs C W, Kwak Y H, Ng T, et a l. Project delivery systems and project change: quantitative analysis [J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2003,129 (4) :382. 被引量:1
  • 5Rojas E M, Kell L. Comparative analysis of project delivery systems cost performance in Pacific Northwest public schools [J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2008,134(6) :387. 被引量:1
  • 6Hale D R, Shrestha P P, Jr G E G, et al. Empirical comparison of design-build and design-bid-build project delivery methods[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2009, 135(7) :579. 被引量:1
  • 7Gordon C M. Choosing appropriate construction contracting method [ J ]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 1994,120 (1) :196. 被引量:1
  • 8Rosner J W,Jr A E T, West C J. Analysis of the design-build delivery method in air force construction projects[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2009,135 ( 8 ) :710. 被引量:1
  • 9Riley D R,Diller B E, Kerr D. Effects of delivery systems on change order size and frequency in mechanical construction[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2005,131(9):953. 被引量:1
  • 10Love P, Edwards D J, Watson H, et al. Rework in civil infrastructure projects: determination of cost predictors [J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2010, 136(3) :275. 被引量:1

共引文献603

同被引文献33

引证文献5

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部