期刊文献+

语义地图模型理论质疑 被引量:1

Questioning on Semantic Map Model Theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 语义地图模型假设人类具有共同的概念空间,但我们无法确定这是否为事实。有些现象表明,我们可能无法进行有意义的比较,因为不同的语言在对现实世界进行概念化的过程中所用的参数、表达手段以及隐喻可能并不一样,甚至是完全不兼容,而这些无法在语义地图模型中得到体现。因此,语义地图模型中的功能节点,很有可能就是不同甚至完全不兼容的概念,而共同概念空间的存在,也就值得质疑了。 Semantic map model assumes that human beings have a common concept of space, but we cannot determine whether this is a fact or not. Some phenomena show that we may not be able to conduct a meaningful comparison, because the parameters, expressing means and metaphor used by the different languages in the process of the real world for encoding or conceptualizing may not be the same, or even are completely incompatible, which cannot be reflected in the semantic model. Therefore, the function nodes of semantic map model are likely different or even completely incompatible with the concept, and the existence of the common concept of space is questionable.
作者 沈掌荣
出处 《浙江海洋学院学报(人文科学版)》 2013年第6期61-67,共7页 Journal of Zhejiang Ocean University(Humane Science)
关键词 语义地图 概念空间 功能 质疑 semantic map concept spacefunction questioning
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Ronald Wayne Langaeker. Foundations of cognitive grammar (II) [M].Stanford: Stanford U Press,1991. 被引量:1
  • 2Ronald Wayne Langacker. Concept, Image, and Symbol: The Cognitive Basis of Grammar[M].Berlin-New York: Mouton de Gruyter,1991. 被引量:1
  • 3Laura Janda. What is the role of semantic maps in cognitive linguistics? [C]//Piotr Stalmaszczyk ,Wieslaw Oleksy.Cognitive approaches to language and linguistic data:Studies in honor of Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk. Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 2009:105-124. 被引量:1
  • 4Ronald Wayne Langacker. FoUndations of cognitive grammar (I) [M].Stanford: Stanford U Press,1987. 被引量:1
  • 5Martin Haspelmath. The geometry of grammatical meaning: semantic maps and cross-linguistic comparison[J]. The new psychology of language,2003 (2): 211-242. 被引量:1
  • 6Helena Lehe kovr. Slavonic versus Finno-Ugric languages: On missing categories in grammar and cognition ,Glossos 4 [EB/OL]. http.'// www.seelrc.org/glossos/issues/4/leheckova.pdf. 被引量:1
  • 7George'Lakoff, Mark Johnson. Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought [M].New York: Basic Books, 1999. 被引量:1
  • 8William Croft. Radical construction grammar[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press,2001. 被引量:1
  • 9Barbara Malt, Steven Sloman, Silvia Gennari. Speaking versus thinking about objects and actions[C]//Dedre Gentner, Susan Goldin- Meadow (Eds.). Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press,2003:81-111. 被引量:1
  • 10Laura Janda.A metaphor in search of a source domain: the categories of Slavic aspect[J].Cognitive Linguistics,2004(15): 471-527. 被引量:1

同被引文献1

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部