期刊文献+

碳补贴政策的博弈分析与策略选择 被引量:3

Game Analysis of Carbon Subsidy Policy and Selection of Strategies
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在两国自由贸易的市场结构下,构建了政府碳补贴政策选择与企业碳减排选择的三阶段博弈模型,研究一国已开征碳税后,继续实施碳补贴政策对本国和外国企业产量、利润的影响。发现碳补贴政策能够激励企业进行碳减排技术的研发,提高本国的碳减排技术水平,并且实施碳补贴政策能够增加本国企业在共同市场上的市场份额和利润,有利于本国企业的可持续发展。 In the free trade market structure, a three-stage game model is constructed for the government and the firm. In this model, the government could choose to implement carbon subsidy policy and the finn to put into effect carbon abatement. Analyzing the impact of carbon subsidy policy on the productions and profits of domestic and foreign finn when carbon tax policy has been used, we have found that carbon subsidy policy could urge the domestic firm to improve its carbon abatement technology and increase its market share and profits. In short, carbon subsidy policy is good for the sustainable development of the domestic finn.
机构地区 暨南大学
出处 《广东外语外贸大学学报》 2014年第1期28-31,共4页 Journal of Guangdong University of Foreign Studies
基金 杨仕辉主持国家自然科学基金项目"环境倾销与环境管制的博弈分析 效应比较与策略选择"(项目批准号:71273114)的研究成果
关键词 碳税政策 碳补贴政策 碳减排 博弈分析 carbon tax policy carbon subsidy policy carbon abatement game analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Porter M. E., Linde C. Toward A New Conception of the Environment- competitiveness Relationship [J]Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1995,(4):97-118. 被引量:1
  • 2Porter M. E., Linde C. Green and Competitive: Ending the Stalemate [J]. Harvard Business Review, 1995, ( 5 ): 120-134. 被引量:1
  • 3Simpson D. and Bradford R. Taxing Variable Cost: Environmental Regulations as Industrial Policy [J]Journal of Envlronmental Economics and Management, 1996, (16):282-300. 被引量:1
  • 4Ambec, Barla. Why Don' t Poor Countries Catch Up: A Cross National Test of an Institutional Explanation [J]J?conomic Inquiry, 2002, 35:3 (July 1997) 590-602. 被引量:1
  • 5Murty M. N., Kumar S. Win-Win Opportunities and Environmental Regulation: Testing of Porter Hypothesis for Indian Manufacturing Industries [ J]. Journal of Enviroaraental Mansgement, 2003, 67:139-144. 被引量:1
  • 6Russo M. and Fouts E The green carrot: do markets reward corporate environmentalism? [M].University of Oregon, Department of Management,mimeo, 1994,234-237. 被引量:1
  • 7Youssef B. S. Transboundary Pollution, R&D Spillovers and International Trade [J].The Annals of Regional Science, 2009, 43:23250. 被引量:1
  • 8Youssef B. S., Zaccour G. Absorptive Capacity, R&D Spillovers, Emissions Taxes and R&D Subsidies [R].MPRA Paper No. 16984, 2009, http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/16984/. 被引量:1
  • 9杨家威.低碳经济中政府补贴的博弈分析[J].商业研究,2010(8):109-112. 被引量:14
  • 10孟卫军.基于减排研发的技术政策选择策略[J].经济问题,2010(9):30-34. 被引量:8

二级参考文献36

  • 1霍伟东,施筱圆.加快环境成本内部化,积极应对反生态倾销[J].生态经济,2007,23(5):47-50. 被引量:8
  • 2Spencer Barbara J,James A Brander. International RgD rivalry and industrial strategy [J]. Review of Economic Studies, 1983,163 : 707-722. 被引量:1
  • 3Brander James A, Barbara J Spencer. Export subsidies and international market share rivalry[J]. Journal of International Economics, 1985,18 (1/2) : 83-100. 被引量:1
  • 4Barrett S. Strategic environmental policy and international trade[J]. Journal of Public Economics, 1994,54 : 325-338. 被引量:1
  • 5Conrad K. Taxes and subsidies for pollution-intensive industries as trade policy [J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1993,25 : 121 - 135. 被引量:1
  • 6Copeland Brian R. Trade and environment: Policy linkages[J]. Environment and Development Economics, 2000,5: 405-432. 被引量:1
  • 7Brian R Copeland, M Scott Taylor. Trade, growth and the environment[J]. Journal of Economic Literature, 2004,42, ( 1 ) : 7-71. 被引量:1
  • 8Hoel Michael. Should a carbon tax be differentiated across sectors[J]. Journal of Public Economics, 1996,59 : 17-32. 被引量:1
  • 9Nannerup N. Strategic environmental policy under incomplete information [J]. Environment and Resource Economics, 1998,11 : 61-78. 被引量:1
  • 10Porter M, C van der Linde. Green and competitive[J]. Harvard Business Review, 1995, (5):120-134. 被引量:1

共引文献41

同被引文献39

引证文献3

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部