摘要
目的：本文探讨在大隐静脉曲张手术中处理分支的曲张静脉时，静脉缝扎与泡沫硬化剂注射两种方法的效果差别。方法本研究采用前瞻式随机对照分组研究方法，收集本院普外一科在2008年1月~2010年12月共计3年间完成的大隐静脉曲张手术150例患者（患肢205条）的临床资料进行分析，比较手术时间、住院费用、止痛药用量、并发症及随访1年、2年、3年患者的复发率。结果使用泡沫硬化剂组手术时间，止痛药明显少于静脉缝扎组。住院费用、并发症及复发率两者差异无统计学意义。结论大隐静脉曲张手术中处理小腿的分支静脉时泡沫硬化剂注射术较分支静脉缝扎有明显优势。
Objectve To approach the effective comparison between the injection of sclerosing foam agent and the transfixion to vein when we deal with the branching varicose vein in operation. Methods By the randomized controlled trials research, collect and analyze the clinical data that we finished 150 intraoperative patients of great saphenous vein we compare the time of operation, the cost of hospitalization, the antidyne, the complication and the recurrence. Results The time of operation, the cost of hospitalization and the antidyne in the injection of sclerosing foam agent were all few than the other, the cost of hospitalization, the antidyne, the complication and the recurrence were no different between two section. Conclusion The injection of sclerosing foam agent is better than the transfixion to vein in the operation to the great saphenous varicose vein.
出处
《中国现代药物应用》
2014年第5期15-16,共2页
Chinese Journal of Modern Drug Application
关键词
静脉缝扎
泡沫硬化剂注射术
大隐静脉曲张
随机对照试验
Transfixion to vein
Injection of sclerosing foam agent
Great saphenous varicose vein
Randomized controlled trials
