摘要
学界在谁是非物质文化遗产保护主体问题上存有争议,而政府是保护主体的观点较占优势。但此观点隐含着非遗传承主体不是保护主体的悖论,与此密切相关的是非遗保护实践中也有行政化过多、民众缺乏主体性的弊端。国内外迄今出台的相关权威文件关于非遗保护的内涵与任务的规定也存在主要关注政府工作而对社区参与重视不够的问题。非物质文化遗产在根本上是民众生活的一部分,非遗的传承与展演必须遵照民众的固有方式与传统。非遗保护的主体应该是以社区民众和传承人为主的社会各方,其中政府部门是起组织、推动作用的关键力量。
There are some disputes in academia on the issue who is the safeguarding subject of the intangible cultural heritage. Meanwhile, the point of view that the government is the safeguarding subject is dominant. However, this viewpoint implies a paradox that transmission subject of the intangible cultural heritage is not safeguarding subject. And it is closely related to the drawbacks of excessive politicization and the lack of subject state of people in the practices of the safeguarding of the intangible cultural heritage. And there is also the problem that the provisions about the content and tasks of the safeguarding of the intangible cultural heritage in the related authoritative documents issued domestically and internationally so far focused on government jobs while paying inadequate attention to the community participation. The transmission and performances of the intangible cultural heritage must comply with the natural ways and tradition of people because the intangible cultural heritage is fundamentally a part of people's lives. The safeguarding subject should be a combination of several social groups in which community residents including inheritors are the main body and government departments are key forces playing the roles of organizers and promoters.
出处
《河南社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第1期109-117,124,共9页
Henan Social Sciences
基金
国家社科基金项目(10BSH031)
江西省普通高等学校人文社会科学重点研究基地九江学院社会系统学研究中心资助项目(SHXTX1213)
关键词
非物质文化遗产
保护主体
政府
社区民众
传承人
intangible cultural heritage
safeguarding subject
government
community residents
inheritors
