期刊文献+

MRI与增强CT对急性胰腺炎分级诊断研究 被引量:1

MRI and Enhanced CT in Diagnosis of Acute Pancreatitis Classification
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:运用改良CT严重指数,比较MRI与CECT对诊断急性胰腺炎分级诊断的准确性。材料与方法:2010年2月-2013年3月于我院确诊为AP的患者纳入研究,回顾分析患者临床以及MRI和CECT表现,MCTSI作为MRI严重指数(MRSI)的指标,分别对AP患者作分级诊断与临床评估结果对照。结果:28例患者临床评估为轻型胰腺炎(37.8%),46例患者临床评估为SAP和MSAP(62.2%);MRSI和MCTSI诊断轻型胰腺炎分别为33例(44.6%)和30例(40.5%)。MRSI诊断SAP和MSAP为44例(55.4%);MCTSI诊断SAP和MSAP共41例(59.4%),MRI诊断SAP和MSAP的准确率高于CECT(95.7%对89.1%),差异无统计学意义(P>0.5)。在揭示急性胰腺炎的病因胆管结石和胆囊结石方面MRI优于CT。结论:MRSI和MCTSI评分对急性胰腺炎分级诊断与临床结合Ranson评分分级诊断结果相似;MRI对轻型急性胰腺炎胰腺实质炎症水肿改变的显示优于CECT;MRI对急性胰腺炎严重程度诊断效果与CECT相似,是判断急性胰腺炎严重程度的可靠方法。 Purpose: Using the modified CT severity index, comparison of MRI and CECT on the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis diagnosis accuracy. Materials and Methods: In 2010 February to 2013 March in our hospital were included in the study of AP patients, retrospective analysis of clinical and MRI and CECT, MCTSI as the MRI severity index (MRSI) in- dex, respectively by MRSI and MCTSI in patients with AP diagnosis and clinical assessment results for hierarchical control. Results: 28 cases of patients with clinical evaluation for mild pancreatitis (37.8%), 46 patients with clinical evaluation for SAP and MSAP (62. 2% ) ; MRSI and MCTSI diagnosis of pancreatitis was 33 cases (44. 6% ) and 30 cases (40. 5% ). MR- SI diagnosis of SAP and MSAP in 44 cases (55.4%) ; MCTSI diagnosis of SAP and MSAP in 41 cases (59.4%) , the accu- racy of MRI diagnosis of SAP and MSAP was higher than that of CECT (95.7% to 89. 1% ), no significant difference ( P 〉 0. 5 ). To reveal the etiology of acute pancreatitis calculus of bile duct and gallbladder stone MRI is superior to CT. Conclu- sion : MRSI and MCTSI score for the grading and clinical diagnosis of acute pancreatitis with similar diagnosis results of Ran- son grading of MRI on mild acute pancreatitis; pancreatic parenchymal inflammation edema is shown to be superior to CECT; severity diagnostic effects of MRI on acute pancreatitis is similar to CECT, is a reliable method to judge the severity of acute pancreatitis.
出处 《现代医用影像学》 2013年第5期382-384,共3页 Modern Medical Imageology
关键词 磁共振成像 体层摄影术 螺旋计算机 急性胰腺炎 诊断 Magnetic resonance imaging Tomography spiral computed Acute pancreatitis Diagnosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1中国急性胰腺炎诊治指南(2013年,上海)[J].中华消化杂志,2013,33(4):217-222. 被引量:870
  • 2Bollen TL, Singh VK, Maurer R, et al. Comparative evalu- ation of the modified CT severity index and CT severity index in assessing severity of acute pancreatitis. AJR Am J Roent- genol, 2011, 197: 386-392. 被引量:1
  • 3梁春丽,刘红燕.急性胰腺炎评分标准的评价[J].中国临床医学,2011,18(4):514-516. 被引量:8
  • 4Amano y, Oishi T, Takahashi M, et al. Nonenhanced mag- netic resonance imaging of mild acute panereatitis [ J ]. Ab- dora Imaging, 2001, 26:59-63. 被引量:1
  • 5Kim YK, Ko SW, Kim CS, et al. Effectiveness of MR ima- ging for diagnosing the mild forms of acute pancreatitis: com- parison with MDCT [ J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2006, 24: 1342 - 1349. 被引量:1
  • 6曾蒙苏,周康荣.胰腺炎.周康荣主编.中华影像医学-肝胆脾胰卷.北京:人民卫生出版社,2003.209-210. 被引量:1
  • 7Bai Y, Liu Y, Jia L, et al. Severe acute pancreatitis in China: etiology and Mortality in 1976 patients. Pancreas, 2007, 35: 232-237~. 被引量:1
  • 8曾蒙苏.正常胰腺影像学表现及变异.见:周康荣主编.中华影像医学--肝胆胰脾卷.北京:人民卫生出版社.2003.214-215. 被引量:2

二级参考文献14

  • 1刘岩,路筝,李兆申,董元航,张文俊,潘雪.APACHEⅡ、Ranson和CT评分系统对重症急性胰腺炎预后评价的比较[J].胰腺病学,2006,6(4):196-200. 被引量:39
  • 2张圣道,雷若庆.重症急性胰腺炎诊治指南[J].中华外科杂志,2007,45(11):727-729. 被引量:1145
  • 3Werner J, Hartwig W, Uhl W, et al. Useful merkers for pedicting severity and monitoring progression of acute pancreatitis [J].Panereatology, 2003,3 (2) : 115-127. 被引量:1
  • 4Darvas K,Futo J, Okros I, et al. Principles of intensive care in severe acute pancreatitis in 2008[J]. Orc Helil, 2068,149 (4) : 2211. 被引量:1
  • 5Balthazar EJ,Robinson DJ, Megibow AJ, et al. Acute pancrea titis: value of CT in establishing prognosis [J].Radiology, 1990,174(2) :331-336. 被引量:1
  • 6Dervenis C, Johnson CD, Bassi C, et al. Diagnosis, objective assess ment of severity, and management of acute pancreatitis. Santorini con sensus conference[J]. Int J Pancreatol, 1999,25 (3) : 195-210. 被引量:1
  • 7Chatzicostas C,Roussomoustakaki M,Varda E, et al. Balthazar corn puted tomography severity index is superior to Ranson criteria and A PACHE II and scoring systems in predicting acute pancreatitis out come[J]. J Clin Gastroenterol,2003,36(3) :253 -260. 被引量:1
  • 8Chatzicostas C, Roussomoustakaki M, Vlachonikolis R, et al. Comparison of Ranson, APACHE Ⅱand APACHE 11 scoring systerm in acute pancreatitis[J].Pancreas, 2002,25 (4) : 331- 335. 被引量:1
  • 9李维勤,童智慧,全竹富,赵允召,虞文魁,叶向红,汪志明,王新颖,王中秋,季大玺,李宁,黎介寿.1033例重症急性胰腺炎治疗经验总结[J].中华外科杂志,2009,47(19):1472-1474. 被引量:56
  • 10许建明,周晓兰.急性胰腺炎临床和形态学分类标准的新认识[J].中华消化杂志,2012,32(9):577-579. 被引量:21

共引文献877

同被引文献6

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部