期刊文献+

基础疾病评分和年龄及慢性健康状况评分对危重病患者预后的影响 被引量:7

Prognosis value of age,chronic healthy score and co-morbidities on mortality of critical ill patients
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:应用年龄评分、慢性健康状况评分(chronichealthyscore,CHS)和基础疾病个数评价基础疾病对危重病患者28d预后的影响。方法:回顾性分析上海长征医院200912—2011-12的危重病患者的临床资料;记录患者的一般状况,计算人院时WIC、CHS和年龄评分、入院后48h内急性生理与慢性健康状况(A—PACHE)评分Ⅱ和脓毒症相关性器官功能衰竭评分(SepsisRelatedOrganFailureAssessment,S()FA)评分;统计各个变量同预后的关系。结果:共有406名患者纳入研究,与存活组比较,死亡组的基础疾病分值、APACHEⅡ分值和sOFA评分较高,肺炎患者比例较高(P(0.05)。年龄评分和基础疾病评分分值越高,死亡率越高(P〈0.01)。年龄,CHS,基础疾病数,APACHEⅡ,SOFA,联合预测概率的曲线下面积(95%可信区间)分别是:0.634(0.570~0.699),0.540(0.471~0.609),O.651(0.587~0.714),0.786(0.734~0.837),O.787(0.736~0.839),0.817(0.768~0.866)。多因素logistic回归分析显示:年龄评分(()R一1.188,95%CI:1.030~1.369,P=0.0.018)、基础疾病评分(OR=1.425。95%CI:1.049~1.934,P=0.023)患者28d预后独立相关,CHS(OR=1.127,95%CI:0.849~1.497,p=0.407)并不是28d预后的独立变量。结论:基本健康状况影响危重病患者的预后,基础疾病联合SOFA评分等有助于对lCU患者28d预后的影响。 Objective:We investigated the effects of age and comorbidites on mortality of critical ill patients three scores system:age group socre, chronic healthy score and numbers of co-morbidities. Method: A single-cen- ter,2-year retrospective study was conducted and all ICU patients were included. General data about patients were recorded, scores of age,CHS, numbers of co-morbidities, APACHE and SOFA score were calculated and associa- tions among each other were analyzed statistically. Result:406 patients were enrolled and divided into survival and non-survival group. Compared with survival group, non-survivors had higher scores of co-morbidities,CHS, age and APACHE ,SOFA(P〈0.05). Patients with high socre of age and co-morbidities had higher mortality. ROC curve area (95 - confidence index) predicting 28 days mortality for age, numbers of co-morbidities,CHS, APACHE H , SOFA and combinations numbers of co-morbidities with APACHE II :0. 634 (0. 570 - 0. 699 ), 0. 540 (0. 471 - 0. 609),0. 651(0. 587-0. 714),0. 786(0. 734-0. 837),0. 787(0. 736-0. 839),0. 817(0. 768-0. 866),respectively. The multivariate logistic regression revealed that risk of death depends significantly of numbers of co-morbidities (OR=1.425,95- CI:1.049-1.934,P=0.023) and age scores(OR=l. 188,95- CI:1.030-1.369,P=0. 018) ,but not scores of CHS(OR-I. 127,95- CI:0. 849-1. 497,P-0. 407). Conclusion:Age and chronic health status could affect mortality among critical ill patients.
出处 《临床急诊杂志》 CAS 2014年第2期85-88,共4页 Journal of Clinical Emergency
关键词 基础疾病 急性生理与慢性健康状况评分Ⅱ 脓毒症相关性器官功能衰竭评分 脓毒症 预后 co-morbidities APACHE II score SOFA score sepsis progonosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1YANG Y, YANG K S, HSANN Y M, et al. The effect of comorbidity and age on hospital mortality and length of stay in patients with sepsis[J]. J Crit Care, 2010,25:398-405. 被引量:1
  • 2CHARLSON M E, POMPEI P, ALES K L, et al. A new method of classifying prognostic comorhidity in longitudinal studies: development and vahdation[J]. J Chronic Dis,1987,40:373-383. 被引量:1
  • 3KNAUS W A,DRAPER E A,WAGNER D P,et al. APACHE Ⅱ: A severity of disease classification sys- tem[J]. Crit Care Med, 1985,13:818-829. 被引量:1
  • 4VINCENT J LDE MENDONCA A,CANTRAINE F,et al. Use of the SOFA score to assess the incidence of organ dysfunction/failure in intensive care units:re- sults of a muhicenter, prospective study. Working group on " sepsis-related problems" of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine[J]. Crit Care Med, 1998,26 : 1793- 1800. 被引量:1
  • 5American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Crit- ical Care Medicine Consensus Conference: definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis[J]. Crit Care Med, 1992,20:864-874. 被引量:1
  • 6WEH1.ER M, KOKOSKA J, REUI.BACH U, et al. Short-term prognosis in critically ill patients with cir- rhosis assessed by prognostic scoring systems[J]. Hepatology, 2001,34 : 255 - 261. 被引量:1
  • 7NEEDHAM D M, SCALES D C, LAUPACIS A, et al. A systematic review o[ the Charlson comorbidity index using Canadian administrative databases: a per- spective on risk adiustment in critical care research [J]. J Crit Care,2005,20:12-19. 被引量:1
  • 8QUACH S,HENNESSY D A,FARIS P,et al. A com- parison between the APACHE 11 and Charlson Index Score for predicting hospital mortality in critically ill patients[J]. BMC Health Serv Res, 2009, 9:129 - 129. 被引量:1
  • 9LESENS O, HANSMANN Y, STORCK D, et al. Risk factors for metastatic infection in patients with Staph ylococcus aureus bacteremia with and without endo carditis[J]. Eur J Intern Med,2003,14:227-231. 被引量:1
  • 10DE GROOT V, BECKERMAN H, LANKHORST G 1,et al. How to measure comorbidity:a critical review of available methods[J]. J clini epidemiol, 2003,56:221-229. 被引量:1

同被引文献82

引证文献7

二级引证文献97

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部