期刊文献+

改良早期预警评分与校正改良预警评分在外科术后患者中的应用对比研究 被引量:27

Application of modified early warning score and calibrated modified early warning score in surgical in-patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨改良早期预警评分(MEWS)与校正MEWS在外科病房手术后患者的应用价值对比.方法:回顾性分析外科病房收治的171例外科手术后患者的临床资料.手术后入病房时即刻作为观察起点,通过查阅病例记录对每一例患者分别进行MEWS和校正MEWS评分,以转出病房为观察终点,资料收集完后进行统计分析.结果:MEWS与校正MEWS评分分值段越高,患者自动出院/死亡、转入ICU比例明显增加,与低分段比较具有统计学意义(P<0.01);以收入ICU为预测指标时,MEWS界值是4,敏感度是54.5%,特异度是90.6%,其ROC曲线下面积(0.878士0.030)(95%:0.848~0.908,P=0.000);校正MEWS界值是5,敏感度是59.1%,特异度是89.3%,其ROC曲线下面积(0.907士0.023)(95%:0.884~0.930,P=0.000).结论:校正MEWS比MEWS评分更能反映外科术后患者病情危重程度,是提高监护级别的扳机点;观察数据护士易于获得,值得在外科病房中推广应用. Objective: To compare the application of modified early warning score { MEWS} and calibrated MEWS in surgical in- patient care. Methods: The MEWS and calibrated MEWS of 171 operation patients at the time of hospitalization in surgical ward were analyzed retrospectively. Results: The incidence of automatic discharge or death or transferred to ICU increased significantly in patients of higher MEWS and calibrated MEWS. The difference had statistical significance compared with lower grade (P〈0.01). Transferred to ICU as predictor, the MEWS assessment boundary value was 4, the sensitivity was 54.5%, specific degree was 90.6%, the area under the ROC curve was (0. 878±0.030) (95%, 0. 848±0. 848, P= 0. 000) ; while Calibrated MEWS assessment boundary value was 5, sensitivity was 59.1 %, specific degree was 89.3 %, the area under the ROC curve was (0. 907±0. 023) (95%, 0. 884±0. 884, P=0. 000). Conclusion: Comparing with MEWS, Calibrated MEWS can reflect the degree of postoperative surgical patients in a critical condition, improve the monitoring level of the trigger point and easy to get by nurses. It is worth popularizing and applying in the surgical ward.
作者 张晨 田丽
出处 《天津护理》 2014年第1期4-6,共3页 Tianjin Journal of Nursing
关键词 改良早期预警评分 校正改良早期预警评分 外科病房 重症监护室 Modified early warning score Calibrated modified early warning score SurgicaI ward Intensive care unit
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献29

  • 1孟新科,杨径,吴华雄,朱虹,郑晓英,魏刚,刘德红,苏顺庭.MEWS与APACHEⅡ评分在急诊潜在危重病患者病情评价和预后预测中的对比研究[J].实用临床医药杂志,2005,9(8):1-4. 被引量:158
  • 2Armagan E, Yilmaz Y, Olmez OF, et al. Predictive value of the modified Early Warning Score in a Turkish emergency department[J]. Eur J Emerg Med, 2008, 15(6):338-340. 被引量:1
  • 3Subbe CP, Kruger M, Rutherford P, et al. Validation of a modified Early Warning Score in medical admissions [J]. OJM, 2001, 94(10):521-526. 被引量:1
  • 4McGloin H,Adams SK,Singer M.Unexpected deaths and referrals to critical care of patients on general wards.Are some cases potentially avalable? Journal of the Royal College of Physicians,1999(33):255-259. 被引量:1
  • 5Goldhill D,Singh S,Tarling M,et al.The patient at risk team:identifying and managing seriously ill ward patients.Anaesthesia,1999(54):853-860. 被引量:1
  • 6Department of Health and Modernization Agency.The National Outreach Report 2003.The Stationery Office,London.2003. 被引量:1
  • 7Subbe CP,Kruger M,Rutherford P,et al.Validation of a Modified Early Warning Score in medical admissions.QJM,2001(94):521-526. 被引量:1
  • 8Subbe CP,Davies RG,Williams E,et al.Effect of introducing the Modified Early Warning Score on clinical outcomes,cardio-pulmonary arrests and intensive care utilization in acute medical admissions.Anaesthesia,2003(58):797-802. 被引量:1
  • 9Cioff J.Nurse's experiences of making decisions to call emergency assistance to their patients.Journal of Advanced Nursing,2000(32):108-114. 被引量:1
  • 10Odell M,Forster AL,Rudman K,et al.The critical care outreach service and the early warning system on surgical wards.Crit Care Nurse,2002,7(3):132-135. 被引量:1

共引文献33

同被引文献204

引证文献27

二级引证文献301

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部