摘要
为明确the new Pad、iPhone4s是否具备专业显示设备的显示性能,以液晶专业显示器A为参考,对这3个显示设备的时间稳定性、不同亮度下不同颜色显示的空间均匀性、不同亮度下色域覆盖率、色品恒定性、通道相加性、设备色域6个方面的性能进行了测试。实验结果表明:iPhone4s在时间稳定性、颜色显示的空间均匀性以及色域覆盖率的稳定性方面优于the new Pad;the new Pad在通道可加性、色品恒定性方面优于iPhone4s;3个显示设备中the new Pad的色域覆盖率最大,iPhone4s的最小;the new Pad各项性能与专业显示器A的相近。The new Pad基本达到专业显示设备的显示性能要求,可作为专业显示设备的辅助设备使用,iPhone4s没有达到专业显示设备的显示性能要求,不适合作为专业显示设备的辅助设备使用。
In order to know whether the new Pad and iPhone4s has the display performance of professional display, the new Pad and iPhone4s were tested to get performance from 6 aspects of time stability,color gamut coverage,color gamut,space uniformity of color display,channel additivity and constant chromaticity with the reference of professional display A. Test results showed that iPhone4s is better than the new Pad on the performance of time stability, space uniformity of Color display and stability of color gamut coverage.The new Pad has better channel additivity and constant chromaticity.the new Pad has the biggest color gamut coverage and the iphone4s has the smallest color gamut coverage in the three displays.In general,the new Pad has little difference in the display performance with the professional display A.The new Pad can achieve the requirements of display performance of professional display fundamentally and can be used as accessory equipment of professional display.The iphone4s cann＇t achieve the requirements of display performance of professional display fundamentally and cann＇t be used as accessory equipment of professional display.
出处
《液晶与显示》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2014年第1期40-47,共8页
Chinese Journal of Liquid Crystals and Displays
基金
国家自然科学基金(No.41271446)
上海市研究生创新基金(JWCXSL1201)
上海市研究生教育创新计划
