期刊文献+

中印两国传统医学医疗资源与服务现状分析 被引量:2

Current situation analysis on resource and service of traditional medicine of China and India
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的通过中印两国传统医学资源及医疗服务现状对比,分析两国传统医学医疗资源与服务发展趋势及主要影响因素。方法资料来源于中印两国政府传统医学相关统计数据,通过对比2003年至2012年间传统医学医院数、床位数、从业人员数、传统医学门诊量、住院量等统计指标分析,中印两国传统医学资源与服务的发展趋势及主要影响因素。结果2012年中国每千万人口中医类医院数为25.1个,印度为25.9个;中国每万人口中医类床位数为4.5张,印度为0.5张;中国每万人口中医类执业(助理)医师数为2.6人,印度为5.9人。2012年中国政府办公立中医类医院的门诊人次数及住院人数分别为42667.1万人次、1688.2万人;印度政府办公立传统医学医院的门诊及住院量分别为7345.5万人次、94.7万人。结论中国、印度传统医学医院数量及每千万人口传统医学医院数量差距不大,但中国传统医学医疗机构床位数量有明显优势,中国传统医学医院诊疗量、住院量及农村初级医疗保健服务量,均明显高于印度;而印度传统医学执业人员数量具有显著优势。 Objective To Analyze the development tendency and major influential factors of the resource and service of traditional medicine (TM) by contrasting the statistical data between China and India. Methods The research data came from the governmental statistical date of traditional medicine. The main statistical indicators included: number of TM hospitals, number of beds in TM institutions, number of health personnel of TM, number of visits and inpatients of TM institutions. A contrastive analysis was given based on these data over the period of 2008-2012. Results In 2012, the number of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) hospital per ten million populations was 25.1, the number of Traditional Indian Medicine (TIM) hospital per ten million populations was 25.9; the number of beds in TCM institutions per ten thousand populations was 4.5, the number of beds in TIM institutions per ten thousand populations was 0.5; the number of TCM physicians and physician assistants per ten thousand populations was 2.6, the number of TIM physicians and physician assistants per ten thousand populations was 5.9. In 2012, the numbers of visits and inpatients of governmental public TCM hospitals were 426.671 million and 16.882 million; the numbers of visits and inpatients of governmental public TIM hospitals were 73.445 million and 0.947 million. Conclusion There was no significant difference in the number of TM hospitals per ten million populations between China and India. China had obviously advantages in the number of beds in TM institutions, number of visits and inpatients of TM institution. India had obviously advantages in the number of TM health personnel.
出处 《国际中医中药杂志》 2014年第3期197-200,共4页 International Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine
关键词 中国传统医学 印度传统医学 医疗资源与服务 Traditional Chinese medicine Traditional Indian medicine: Medical resource and service
  • 相关文献

同被引文献33

引证文献2

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部