期刊文献+

中国“三农”问题理论的范式冲突、学术生态与迷思之我见 被引量:2

China's Theory of“Three Rural Issues”Paradigm of Conflict, Academic Ecology and Myth
原文传递
导出
摘要 中国工业化增速的趋缓,城乡差距的持续扩大,传统农业生产模式的衰落,使三农问题日趋严峻,严重影响到国家的粮食安全与社会稳定,急需进行深刻的农村体制改革。但由于三农研究范式的陈旧,学术生态的恶化以及旧意识形态的束缚,使三农改革难以取得实质性突破,双方在农地产权制度改革、1.2亿hm2耕地红线判断,刘易斯拐点是否到来,土地是否具有社保功能、资本下乡的利弊等关键问题上存在严重分歧。只有尽快净化学术生态,改进学术研究方法,突破利益集团与旧意识形态的束缚,我们才能转变思维范式,树立正确的发展观念,为全面的农村体制改革扫清思想障碍。 China's industrial growth is slowing, the widening gap between the urban and rural areas, the decline of traditional agricultural production mode, make agriculture, rural areas and farmers problems become increasingly serious, seriously affect the country's food security and social stability, the need to carry on the profound reform in the countryside. But due to the old agriculture research paradigm, the academic ecological degradation and the constraints of old ideology, the rural reform is difficult to make substantive breakthrough, the two sides in the farmland property rights system reform, 120 million hn~ red line judgment, lewis turning point is coming, whether the land has social security function, the pros and cons of capital to the countryside on the key problems; such as there are serious differences. Only purify academic environment as soon as possible, improve the method of academic research, break through the constraints of interest group and the old ideology, we can change the paradigm of thinking, set up correct concept of development, for the comprehensive rural reform thinking barrier.
作者 王文龙
出处 《农业现代化研究》 CSCD 北大核心 2014年第1期48-52,共5页 Research of Agricultural Modernization
基金 农业部委托课题"刘易斯拐点 耕地红线判断与农地制度改革研究"(编号:Z201231)
关键词 范式冲突 学术生态 意识形态 舆论控制 三农迷思 paradigm conflict academic ecological ideological public opinion to control agriculture, rural areas andfarmers myth
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献32

共引文献253

同被引文献54

  • 1北京天则经济研究所.粮食安全与耕地保护[R].2008. 被引量:1
  • 2李斌.三论18亿亩耕地红线该不该守[N].证券时报,2012一08-28(3). 被引量:2
  • 3周峰.乡村旅游经济对"三农"的影响力研究--以浙江平湖为例[D].杭州:浙江大学,2012. 被引量:1
  • 4约翰.德雷泽克.地球政治学:环境话语[M].蔺雪春,郭晨星,译.济南:山东大学出版社,2012:8-144. 被引量:1
  • 5FISCHER F,FORESTER J. The argumentative turn in policy a-nalysis and planning[ M]. Durham, NC: Duke University Press,1993:l-3. 被引量:1
  • 6HAJER M. The politics of environmental discourse ecological mod-ernization and the policy process [ M ]. Oxford : Oxford UniversityPress, 1995:59. 被引量:1
  • 7HAJER M. A Frame in the Fields : policymaking and the reinven-tion of politics [ C ] // HAJER M,WAGENAAR H. DeliberativePolicy Analysis : Understanding Governance in the Network Socie-ty. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2003 : 44-110. 被引量:1
  • 8林子伦.台湾气候变迁政策之论述分析[J].公共行政学报,2008’ 28: 153-175. 被引量:1
  • 9郄建荣.18亿亩耕地红线守得住吗?[N].中华新闻报,2007-06-29 (C02). 被引量:1
  • 10温家宝.国务院政府工作报告[EB/OL].(2009-03-16) [2014-05-20]. http: //www. gov. cn/test/2009-03/16/content_1260188.html. 被引量:1

引证文献2

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部