摘要
公安部在内部规范性文件中将"调取证据"规定为一项具体的取证措施,并做了较为详尽的规范。现行规范对调取证据的性质界定不明,与搜查、扣押等措施的界限不清,以致制定相关规则时,未能理顺与其它取证措施间的相互关系,给侦查人员在运用此措施时造成理论和实践上的一些困惑。设置"调取证据"这一专门的取证措施本身的意义在于规范任意侦查行为,而无权创设一类新的强制性侦查措施。因此,有必要对其在程序上进一步加以规范和改进。
Evidence Collection, a measure of finding evidence, is specifically regulated in the internal documents of the Ministry of Public Security; The present regulation does not clearly define the character of evidence collection and confuses it with other measures like search and seizure; so in related regulations, the interrelationship of evidence collection is not straightened out with other measures of accessing evidences and investigators are confused in applying. Making the meas- ure of Evidence Collemion special means to regulate some arbitrary investigation activities, and it＇s not authorized to set a new mandatory investigation measure. Therefore, it is necessary to further regulate and improve the process of the meas- ure.
出处
《四川文理学院学报》
2014年第1期43-46,共4页
Sichuan University of Arts and Science Journal
基金
2012年度中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金重点项目"法定侦查行为实施规范研究"(ZD201205)
关键词
调取证据
任意侦查
强制侦查
Evidence Collection
arbitrary investigation activities
mandatory investigation
