期刊文献+

贲门失弛缓症的治疗现状及进展 被引量:5

Treatment Status and Progress of Achalasia
原文传递
导出
摘要 贲门失弛缓症(achalasia)是一种少见的食管运动障碍性疾病,其病因及发病机制至今仍未明确。临床主要表现为不同程度的吞咽困难、食物反流、误吸、胸痛和体重下降。治疗的主要目的是降低食管下端括约肌压(lower esophageal sphincter pressure,LESP)、缓解症状。治疗方法有多种,包括口服药物治疗、肉毒杆菌毒素注入法、球囊扩张术和手术治疗等。目前,多数学者则更倾向于在腔镜下行手术治疗,从而达到缓解症状、防止反酸等满意的远期疗效。然而,学者之间在非手术与手术的选择、经胸还是经腹、食管肌层切开术远端最佳延伸长度、是否附加抗反流术以及附加何种抗反流术等诸多问题上尚存在较大的争议。为此,我们对贲门失弛缓的治疗现状及进展进行了综述。 Achalasia is a rare motor disorder of the esophagus and its etiology and pathogenesis remain unclear. Its clinical presentation typically includes various degrees of dysphagia, regurgitation, aspiration, chest pain and weight loss. The main therapy purpose for achalasia is to reduce lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP) so as to alleviate clinical symptoms. There are a variety of treatment methods for achalasia, such as pharmacotherapy, intrasphincteric botulinum toxin injection, endoscopic pneumatic dilatation and surgical thorascopic surgery to achieve satisfactory long-term results intervention. At present, most scholars prefer laparoscopic or including alleviated symptoms and prevention of acid reflux. However, great controversy still exists among scholars regarding the choice of conservative therapy or surgery, transtho- racic or transabdominal surgery, optimal distal extent of myotomy, the need and choice of additional antireflux procedures. In this review, we focus on current therapy and progress of achalasia.
作者 王刚 张逊
出处 《中国胸心血管外科临床杂志》 CAS 2014年第1期107-111,共5页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
关键词 贲门失弛缓症 球囊扩张术 腹腔镜 改良Heller 胃底折叠术 Achalasia Pneumatic dilatation Laparoscopy Modified Heller myotomy Fundoplieation
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献98

  • 1[1]Nissen R.Eine einfache Operation zur Beeinflussung der Refluxoesophagitis.Schweizer Medizinische Wochenschrift 1956;86:590-592 被引量:1
  • 2[2]Dallemagne B,Weerts JM,Jehaes C,Markiewicz S,Lombard R.Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication:preliminary report.Surg Laparosc Endosc 1991; 1:138-143 被引量:1
  • 3[3]Carlson MA,Frantzides CT.Complications and results of primary minimally invasive antireflux procedures:a review of 10735 reported cases.J Am Coll Surg 2001; 193:428-439 被引量:1
  • 4[4]Flum DR,Koepsell T,Heagerty P,Pellegrini CA.The nationwide frequency of major adverse outcomes in antireflux surgery and the role of surgeon experience,1992-1997.J Am Coll Surg 2002; 195:611-618 被引量:1
  • 5[5]Patti MG,Arcerito M,Feo CV,De Pinto M,Tong J,Gantert W,Tyrrell D,Way LW.An analysis of operations for gastroesophageal reflux disease:identifying the important technical elements.Arch Surg 1998; 133:600-606; discussion 606-607 被引量:1
  • 6[6]Spechler SJ.Comparison of medical and surgical therapy for complicated gastroesophageal reflux disease in veterans.The Department of Veterans Affairs Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Study Group.N Engl J Med 1992; 326:786-792 被引量:1
  • 7[7]Lafullarde T,Watson DI,Jamieson GG,Myers JC,Game PA,Devitt PG.Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication:five-year results and beyond.Arch Surg 2001; 136:180-184 被引量:1
  • 8[8]Anvari M,Allen C.Five-year comprehensive outcomes evaluation in 181 patients after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication.J Am Coll Surg 2003; 196:51-57; discussion 57-58; author reply 58-59 被引量:1
  • 9[9]McKenzie D,Grayson T,Polk HC Jr.The impact of omeprazole and laparoscopy upon hiatal hernia and reflux esophagitis.J Am Coll Surg 1996; 183:413-418 被引量:1
  • 10[10]Lundell L,Miettinen P,Myrvold HE,Pedersen SA,Liedman B,Hatlebakk JG,Julkonen R,Levander K,Carlsson J,Lamm M,Wiklund I.Continued (5-year) followup of a randomized clinical study comparing antireflux surgery and omeprazole in gastroesophageal reflux disease.J Am Coll Surg 2001; 192:172-179; discussion 179-181 被引量:1

共引文献6

同被引文献27

引证文献5

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部