期刊文献+

薄弱学校委托管理的法律保障机制研究——以美国《特许学校法》问责条款为例 被引量:4

Improving the quality of low-performing schools by trust through legislation: Charter School Revocation Statue in the USA
原文传递
导出
摘要 薄弱学校改进有赖于法律提供保障,而问责又是薄弱学校改进法律保障体系不可或缺的内容。薄弱学校委托管理的根基是市场化和公益信托,强有力的问责机制是其成败的关键。基于信托机制的特许学校政策是美国改进薄弱学校的主要措施,美国允许开办特许学校的州均颁布了《特许学校法》。由于一些州《特许学校法》的问责条款不够完善,导致法律的可操作性较弱,对不合格特许学校的问责未能落到实处,从而引起人们对特许学校这一改革措施成效的极大争议。我国薄弱学校改进中的"委托管理"也面临着法律保障的问题,美国《特许学校法》的经验与教训可以为我们提供些许借鉴与启示。 Legislation is essential to improve the quality of low-performing schools. Accountability is an important part of the legal protection system for the improvement of low-performing schools. Turning low-performing schools into Trust Schools is based on the theory of charitable trust market, so strong accountability mechanisms are the key to its success. Charter School is one of the measures taken to improve the quality of low-performing schools. Forty-two states and the District of Columbia have enacted charter school laws and charter school revocation statutes are included in these laws. Because of the discrepancy in defining the reasons for revocation and revocation procedure, the effectiveness of the laws vary a lot. The result is that the low-performing charter schools are not punished and received the Federal funding as other charter schools. This lead to the low efficiency of the Federal funding and caused great dispute on the charter schools policy. We can learn a lot from charter school legislation in America.
作者 索磊
出处 《教育发展研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第24期55-61,共7页 Research in Educational Development
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目"二战后美国联邦政府立法对教师教育影响研究"(13YJC880103) 闽南师范大学新世纪优秀人才支持计划"基础教育均衡发展政策的国际比较研究"(SX1004)的阶段性成果
关键词 美国特许学校 薄弱学校 委托管理 法律保障 问责 the USA, Charter School, low-performing schools, legislation
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1周霖,李刚.学校改进中的校长问责制:必要性、可能性及其潜在难题[J].现代教育管理,2010(9):35-38. 被引量:5
  • 2VergariSandra. The Politics of Charter Schools[J].Educational Policy ,2007,21(1 ): 15-39. 被引量:1
  • 3黄嘉雄.美国信托学校理念与制度之探讨[J].国立台北师范学院学报,2000,(13):177-202. 被引量:1
  • 4CharterSchool Institute, StateUniversity of New York. Frequently Asked Questions About Charter Schools[EB/OL]. http://www.newyorkcharters.org/documents/generalFAQ12-4-07cov.doc.2013-05-18. 被引量:1
  • 5Grosho.fD.Unchartered Territory: Market Competition’s Constitutional Collision with Entrepreneurial Sex-Segregated CharterSchools[EB/OL].B.Y.U. Education and Law Journal, 2010:320.http://ssm.com/abstract=1441357. 被引量:1
  • 6LawtonS B. Effective Charter Schools and Charter School Systems[J].Planning and Changing,2009,40( 1/2):35-60. 被引量:1
  • 7BettingerE P.The Effect of Charter Schools on Charter Students and Public Schools[J].Economics of Education Review, 2005(24):133-147. 被引量:1
  • 8Centeron Innovation & Improvement.Selecting the Intervention Model and Partners/Providers for a Low-Achieving School: A Decision -Makingand Planning Tool for the Local Education Agency [EB/OL]. http://www.centerii.org/leamodel/resources/Selecting%20the%20Interventi on%20 Model%20and%20Partners%20-%20DOCUMENT.doc.2013-05-18. 被引量:1
  • 9Grady D P. Charter School Revocation: A Method for Efficiency, Accountability, and Success[J].Journal of Law & Education,2012,41(3):513-554. 被引量:1
  • 10Thecenter for education reform.charter school law [EB/OL]. [2013 -05 -18] http://www.edreform.com/issues/choice -charter -schools/laws -legislation/. 被引量:1

二级参考文献14

共引文献13

同被引文献74

引证文献4

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部