期刊文献+

上尿路结石CT值对结石成分和体外冲击波碎石(ESWL)疗效的预测和评价 被引量:13

Predict the composition of upper urinary tract lithiasis and assess the curative effect of ESWL by different CT values
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 总结不同CT值对应的结石成分,对结石成分初步估计;评价不同CT值的上尿路结石行体外冲击波碎石(ESWL)的疗效.方法 建立筛选条件收集在本院行体外冲击波碎石治疗的患者169例,治疗前行结石CT平扫检查,治疗后收集碎石测定结石成分并记录治疗方式、过程和结果.结果 一水草酸钙结石(716±191 Hu)、磷酸钙结石(1197±221Hu)、尿酸结石(372±49 Hu)、磷酸钙+一水草酸钙结石(981±283 Hu)、尿酸+磷酸钙结石(556±299 Hu)之间CT值的差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);结石获得1次碎石排空、2次碎石排空和2次碎石不能排空对应的CT值范围分别为(537±71)Hu、(833±80) Hu和(989±96) Hu,三组间比较差异有统计学意义(F=44.679,P=0.000).结论 治疗前CT平扫可以初步预测结石的成分,并对治疗方法的选择提供参考. Objectives To summarize different CT value and the corresponding calculus composition,then make an intial estimate to calculus composition ; evaluate the curative effect of ESWL in different CT value.Methods Establish screening condition and collected 290 patients who received ESWL in our hospital,examine CT plain scan before treatment and collect stone fragment determine the composition.Record the therapy method,process and result.Results Among calcium oxalate monohydrate calculus(716 ± 191 Hu),Calcium phosphate calculus(1197 ± 221 Hu),uric acid calculus(372 ± 49 Hu),calcium phosphate and calcium oxalate monohydrate calculus(981 ±283 Hu),uric acid and calcium phosphate calculus(556 ±299Hu).their CT values of the difference has statistical significance(P < 0.05) ;There was a statistically significant diference among once-teatment group,twice-teatment group and twice-teatment still useless group (F =44.679,P =0.000).Conclusions Examine CT plain scan before treatment can initial estimate the calculus composition and to direct the chose of treatment method.
出处 《国际泌尿系统杂志》 2014年第1期19-21,共3页 International Journal of Urology and Nephrology
关键词 尿路结石 体层摄影术 X线计算机 碎石术 Urinary Calculi Tomography, X-Ray Computed Lithotripsy
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1叶章群.泌尿系结石研究现况与展望[J].中华实验外科杂志,2005,22(3):261-262. 被引量:268
  • 2李新德,陈岳兵,许力为,吴海洋,余大敏,芮雪芳,张大宏,李恭会,丁国庆,马亮.影响体外冲击波碎石术疗效的因素分析[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2005,26(5):321-323. 被引量:53
  • 3Yoshida S,Hayashi T,Ikeda J. Role of volume and attenuation value histogram of urinary stone on noncontrast helical computed tomography as predictor of fragility by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy[J].{H}UROLOGY,2006,(01):33-37. 被引量:1
  • 4El-Assmy A,Abou-El-Ghar M E,El-Nahas A R. Multidetector computed tomography:role in determination of urinary stones composition and disintegration with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy--an in vitro study[J].{H}UROLOGY,2011,(02):286-290. 被引量:1
  • 5Tomomasa H,Kaneko S,Ogawa K. Results of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for the treatment of upper urinary tract stones[J].{H}Hinyokika Kiyo Acta Urologica Japonica,2007,(11):771-776. 被引量:1
  • 6刘成山,邵志强,张鹏,郑少斌.影响上尿路结石体外冲击波碎石预后的因素[J].南方医科大学学报,2008,28(11):2063-2065. 被引量:26

二级参考文献15

  • 1李新德,陈岳兵,许力为,吴海洋,余大敏,芮雪芳,张大宏,李恭会,丁国庆,马亮.影响体外冲击波碎石术疗效的因素分析[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2005,26(5):321-323. 被引量:53
  • 2Lalak NJ, Moussa SA, Smith G, et al. The domier compact delta lithotripter: the first 150 ureteral calculi [J]. J Endourol, 2002, 16 (9): 645-8. 被引量:1
  • 3Obek C, Onal B, Kantay K, et al. The efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for isolated lower pole calculi compared with isolated middle and upper caliceal calculi [J]. J Urol, 2001, 166(6): 2081-5. 被引量:1
  • 4Sorensen CM, Chandhoke PS. Is lower pole calieeal anatomy predictive of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy success for primary lower pole kidney stones [J ] ? J Urol, 2002, 168(6): 2377-83. 被引量:1
  • 5Gnanapragasam VJ, Ramsden PD, Murthy LS, et al. Primary in situ extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the management ofureteric calculi: results with a third-generation lithotripter [J]. BJU Int, 1999, 84(7): 770-4. 被引量:1
  • 6Bierkens AF, Hendrikx AJ, De La Rosette J J, et al. Treatment of mid- and lower ureteric calculi: extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy vs laser ureteroscopy. A comparison of costs, morbidity and effectiveness[J]. Br J Urol, 1998, 81(1): 31-5. 被引量:1
  • 7Abdel-Khalek M, Sheir K, Elsobky E, et al. Prognostic factors for extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy of ureteric stones--a multivariate analysis study[J]. Scand J Urol Nephrol, 2003, 37(5): 413-8. 被引量:1
  • 8Sumino Y, Mimata H, Tasaki Y, et al. Predictors of lower pole renal stone clearance after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy [J]. J Urol, 2002, 168(4 Pt 1): 1344-7. 被引量:1
  • 9Elbahnasy AM, Clayman RV, Shalhav AL, et al. Lower-pole caliceal stone clearance after shockwave lithotripsy, pereutaneous nephrolithotomy, and flexible ureteroscopy: impact of radiographic spatial anatomy[J]. J Endourol, 1998, 12(2): 113-9. 被引量:1
  • 10Delakas D, Karyotis I, Daskalopoulos G, et al. Independent predictors of failure of shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral stones employing a second-generation lithotripter[J]. J Endourol, 2003, 17(4): 201-5. 被引量:1

共引文献342

同被引文献66

引证文献13

二级引证文献70

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部