摘要
奎因把知识论视为心理学的一章,即一门单纯的描述性学科。普特南、戴维森和罗蒂对这条自然化道路进行了深刻反思,逐渐形成一种逃离自然主义的趋势,试图恢复知识论的规范维度。然而,直至索萨提出德性知识论之后才发展出一种较为系统的解释框架,它以理智德性和认知视角为核心,能够兼顾知识论的规范性和描述性这两个维度。德性知识论是化解传统知识论与自然科学这场遭遇战的一条可能路径。
Quine sees epistemology as a chapter of psychology, viz. a purely descriptive discipline. Putnam, Davidson and Rorty have reflected deeply on this naturalistic approach, and with a tendency to escape haturalism, they tried to recover the normative dimension of epistemology. Not until Sosa advocated a virtue epistemology, however, did a more systematic framework arise. It is based on intellectual virtues and epistemic perspective, taking both the norma- tive and descriptive dimensions of epistemology into consideration. Virtue epistemology is a possible approach to re- solving the conflict between the natural science and the traditional theory of knowledge.
出处
《科学技术哲学研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第1期56-60,共5页
Studies in Philosophy of Science and Technology
基金
教育部人文社会科学课题青年基金:德性
真理与知识--当代德性知识论研究(12YJC720005)
关键词
自然化知识论
德性知识论
描述性
规范性
索萨
naturalistic epistemology
virtue epistemologoy
descriptiveness
normativity
Sosa
