期刊文献+

腹腔镜结肠癌根治术的临床评估 被引量:3

Clinical Assessment of Laparoscopic Radical Resection of Colon Cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨腹腔镜结肠癌根治术的临床疗效。方法选取该院收治的结肠癌患者94例,随机分为对照组和实验组两组,对照组行开腹结肠癌根治术,实验组行腹腔镜结肠癌根治术,观察两组患者的手术情况、并发症发生率及存活率。结果两组患者术中出血量、术后排气时间、住院时间比较,实验组均少于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);淋巴结清除数、手术时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),两组并发症发生率比较,实验组明显小于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),术后存活率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论腹腔镜结肠癌根治术具有创伤小、恢复快的优点,安全、有效,值得临床推广应用。 Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic radical resection for patients with colon cancer. Methods 94 patients with colon cancer admitted in our hospital were randomly divided into control group (n=47) and experimental group (n= 47). The control group was treated with open resection of colon cancer, and the experimental group was treated with laparoscopic radical resection of colon cancer. Observations were carried out about the patients" surgery, the incidence of complications and survival rate in both groups. And the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic radical resection of colon cancer was discussed. Results The intraoperative blood loss of the patients in the experimental group was less than that of the patients in the control group, and postoperative exhaust time and average stay length were shorter than those of the patients in the control group, the differences were statistically significant (P〈0.05);There were no statistical differences i br operation time and number of lymph node dissection of the patients in both groups (P〉0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications of the experimental group was significantly lower than that of the control group, the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P〈0.05). The postoperative survival rate compared between the groups showed no statistical significance (P〉0.05). Conclusion Laparoscopic radical resection of colon cancer has the advantages of minimal invasion, quick recovery, safety and effectiveness, and which is worthy of clinical application.
作者 高进
出处 《中外医疗》 2013年第36期7-7,9,共2页 China & Foreign Medical Treatment
关键词 结肠癌 腹腔镜根治术 临床评估 Colon cancer Laparoscope Clinical assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献27

  • 1郑民华.我国腹腔镜结直肠手术的现状与评价[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2001,6(4):247-248. 被引量:18
  • 2Bentrem DJ, Dematteo RP, Blumganr LH. Surgical therpy for Metastatic disease to liver. Ann Rev Med, 2005, 56:139-156. 被引量:1
  • 3McKenzie S, Barnes S, Schwartz RW. The surgical management of locoregnal and metastatic colorectal cancer recurrences. Current Surg, 2005, 62(6) :585-590. 被引量:1
  • 4Borner MM. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for unresectable liver metastases of colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol, 1999, 10(6) :623. 被引量:1
  • 5Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S,et al. Laparoscopy- assisted coleetomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non- metastatic colon cancer.a randomised trial. Lancet,2002,359 (9325): 2224-2229. 被引量:1
  • 6Korolija D,Tadic S,Simic D. Extent of nncological resection in Laparoscopic vs open clorectal surgery: meta-analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2003,387(9-10): 366-371. 被引量:1
  • 7Scheidbach H,Schneider C, Hugel O,et al. Oncological quality and preliminary longterm results in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc,2003,17(6): 903-910. 被引量:1
  • 8Campos FG. Complicatins and conversions in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: results of a mulicenter Brazilian trial. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2003,13(3): 173-179. 被引量:1
  • 9Lacy Am,Garcia-Valdecasas JC,Delgado S,et al. Laproscopy- assisted eolectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non- metastatic colon cancer: a randomized trial. Lancet,2002,359 (9325):2224-2229. 被引量:1
  • 10[3]AMY IJ,Vaginal hysterectomy[J].Natl med J India.1997,10:126-127. 被引量:1

共引文献57

同被引文献11

引证文献3

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部