期刊文献+

从国际信息公开领域新变化审视我国信息公开制度 被引量:4

A Survey on Information Disclosure System in China from the New Changes in the International Information Disclosure Field
原文传递
导出
摘要 近年来国际信息公开领域发生了一些新变化。信息公开法律模型从原先的以被动公开为主转向如今的以主动公开为主。信息公开促进机构从以前仅关注信息公开法律的推广,到现在开始致力于信息公开法律的实施成效,并建立了分析信息公开制度实施的若干模型。信息公开法律的实施也呈现出依法和依服务两种不同方式。我国通过了以主动公开为主的《信息公开法》,它对旧有的信息公开制度实施分析模型提出了挑战,信息流通模型应运而生。但是因为我国目前采取了依法方式的信息公开制度实施策略,阻碍了我国信息公开制度实施成效的发挥。 New changes have taken place in the international information disclosure field in recent years. The legal model of information disclosure has changed from the previous emphasis on passive disclosure to the current emphasis on active disclosure. The information disclosure promotion organizations only paid attention to the popularization of information disclosure law in the past, however, they have started to commit themselves to the implementation effect of information disclosure law at present, and have constructed several models to analyze the implementation of information disclosure system. Two different ways of depending on law and depending on service have emerged in the implementation of information disclosure law. An information disclosure law emphasi- zing on active disclosure has been passed in China. It challenges the previous information disclosure system implementation and a- nalysis model. Information flow model arises at the historic moment. However, as China has adopted the information disclosure sys- tem implementation strategies of depending on law at present, giving the information disclosure system implementation effect into full play has been impeded.
作者 肖卫兵
出处 《情报理论与实践》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第1期27-31,共5页 Information Studies:Theory & Application
基金 上海市浦江人才计划项目(项目编号:12PJC010) 上海市教育委员会科研创新项目(项目编号:13YS134)资助的研究成果
关键词 信息公开 主动公开 被动公开 依法方式 information disclosure active disclosure passive disclosure way of depending on law
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1PATERSON M. Freedom of information and privacy in Austral- ia: government and information access in the modern state [ M]. Melbourne: LexisNexis Butterwoxtlas, 2005 : 498. 被引量:1
  • 2SCHARTUM D W. Information access legislation for the future? possibilities according to Norwegian experience [ C] //AICH- HOLZER G, BURKET H. Public Sector Information in the Digital Age: Between Markets, Public Management and Citi- rights. Cheltenham : Edward Elgar Publishing, 2004 : 76. 被引量:1
  • 3BENNETT C. Understanding tipple effects: the cross-national adoption of policy instruments for bureaucratic accountability [J]. Governance. 1997 (10): 213. 被引量:1
  • 4TERRILL G. Individualism and freedom of information legisla- tion [J]. Freedom of Information Review, 2000, 87: 30. 被引量:1
  • 5CRAGLIA M, BLAKEMORE M. Access models for public sec- tor information : the spatial data context [ C ] // AICHHOLZ- ER G, BURKET H. Public Sector Information in the Digital Age: Between Markets, Public Management and Citizens' Rights. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2004: 187. 被引量:1
  • 6TANKERSLEY M. How the electronic freedom of information act amendments of 1996 update public access for the information age [J]. Administrative Law Review, 1998, 50: 422. 被引量:1
  • 7BLANTON T. The openness revolution: the rise of a global movement for freedom of information [ J ]. Development Dia- logue, 2002 ( 1 ) : 16. 被引量:1
  • 8ALI M A. Freedom of information in South Asia: comparative perspectives on civil society initiative [ EB/OL]. [ 2011-05- 20 ]. http: //www. jdhr. org/publications/papers/Mukhtar% 20A% 20Ali-Media% 20panel-0Edited% 2027.4. pdf. 被引量:1
  • 9ROBERTS A. Blacked out: government secrecy in the informa-tion age [ M ]. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006: 110. 被引量:1
  • 10Article 19. Right to know: principles on freedom of information legislation [ EB/OL ]. [ 2011-06-13 ]. http : //www. arti- cle19, org/pdfs/standards/fighttoknow, pdf. 被引量:1

二级参考文献12

  • 1本报特约评论员 李拯.官员财产公开,期待“成功案例”[N].新华每日电讯.2012(003) 被引量:1
  • 2Rick Snell."Constructing a Field:Commonwealth FOI Studies,"[].Comparative Administrative Law Lecture August.72009 被引量:1
  • 3Bennett,CJ.Understanding ripple effects: the cross-national adoption of policy instruments for bureaucratic accountability[].Governance.1997 被引量:1
  • 4Rick Snell."Failing the Information Game,"[].P ublic Administration Today.2007 被引量:1
  • 5Darbishire H.Proactive Transparency:The Future of theRight to Information?. http://wbi.worldbank.org/wbi/document/proactive-transparencythe-future-right-information . 2010 被引量:1
  • 6Department of Justice.Guide to the Freedom of InformationAct Proactive Disclosures. http://www.justice.gov/oip/foia_guide09/proactive-disclosures.pdf . 2009 被引量:1
  • 7Blanton T S.The Openness Revolution:The Rise of aGlobal Movement for Freedom of Information[].DevelopmentDialogue.2002 被引量:1
  • 8Taylor J A.Informatization as X-ray:What Is PublicAdministration for the Information Age?[].Public Administration in anInformation Age:A Handbook.1998 被引量:1
  • 9Xiao W.Freedom of Information Reform in China:Information Flow Analysis[]..2012 被引量:1
  • 10Falconer C.Farewell to the Blight of Secrecy[]..2004 被引量:1

同被引文献56

引证文献4

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部