期刊文献+

冠状动脉临界病变的诊疗策略 被引量:1

下载PDF
导出
摘要 冠状动脉造影(coronaryarteriography,CAG)作为诊断冠心病的金标准目前已被广泛应用,造影所示冠状动脉狭窄程度是目前能否进行临床干预的主要依据。尽管CAG在解剖学上评价冠脉狭窄程度的作用已被广泛认可,但其并不能准确评价心肌缺血程度及斑块稳定性。一般认为,血管狭窄程度在70%以上的病变会引起明显的心肌缺血而需行介入治疗或血管旁路移植手术。而对于狭窄程度在40%~70%的冠脉临界病变(又称中等程度狭窄)是否需要介入治疗尚无定论。虽然临界病变本身的介入治疗成功率很高,但由于介入本身存在一定并发症及再狭窄风险,因此需综合考虑手术风险及获益比值来决定是否行介入治疗。
作者 李娇 李新明
出处 《重庆医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第36期4464-4467,共4页 Chongqing medicine
基金 上海市科技创新项目(114119a9100)
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, et al. 2011 ACCF/ AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Inter vention. A report of the American Coolege of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidlines and the Socrety for Cardiovascular An- glorophy and Interveations[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2011, 58(24) :e44-122. 被引量:1
  • 2Tobis J, Azarbal B, Slavin L. Assessment of intermediate se- verity coronary lesions in the catheterization laboratory [J]. J Am Coll Cardiol,2007,49(8) :839-848. 被引量:1
  • 3Piils N H,Van Schaardenburgh P, Manoharan G, et al. Percu-taneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignifi- cant stenosis:5-year follow up of the DEFER study[J] J Am Coil Cardiol,2007,49(21) :2105-2111. 被引量:1
  • 4Sharma K,Kohli P,Gulati M,et al. An update on exercise stress testing[J]. Curr Probl Cardiol, 2012,37 (5) : 177- 202. 被引量:1
  • 5Sun JL, Han R,Guo JH, et al. The Diagnostic Value of Treadmill Exercise Test Parameters for Coronary Artery Disease[J]. Cell Biochem Biophys, 2013,65 ( 1 ) : 69-76. 被引量:1
  • 6王仲华,董能斌,方永祥,张晓红.活动平板试验在冠状动脉临界病变介入治疗中的应用价值[J].实用心脑肺血管病杂志,2011,19(4):517-519. 被引量:4
  • 7Parker MW,Iskandar A, Limone B,et al. Diagnostic accu- racy of cardiac positron emission tomography versus sin- gle photon emission computed tomography for coronary artery disease: a bivariate Meta-analysis[J]. Circ Cardio vasc Imaging,2012,5(6) =700-707. 被引量:1
  • 8应红.核素心肌灌注显像在冠心病危险度分层中的临床意义[J].重庆医学,2009,38(12):1500-1501. 被引量:8
  • 9Pijls NH, Fearon WF,Tonino PA, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous cor- onary intervention in patients with muhivessel coronary artery disease: 2 year follow up of the FAME (fractional flow reserve versus angiography for multivessel evalua- tion) study[J]. J Am Coil Cardiol,2010,56(3) :177 184. 被引量:1
  • 10Lindstaedt M, Halilcavusogullari Y, Yazar A,et al. Clini cal outcome following conservative vs revascularization therapy in patients with stable coronary artery disease and borderline fractional flow reserve measurements[J]. Clin Cardiol,2010,33(2):77-83. 被引量:1

二级参考文献11

共引文献12

同被引文献5

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部