期刊文献+

不同添加剂对低水分虉草青贮品质的影响 被引量:8

Effects of Different Additives on The Silage Quality of Phalaris arundinacea L. with Low Water Content
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以低水分虉草(DM:525.44g·kg-1)为研究对象,探讨青宝Ⅱ号(FS)、乳酸菌制剂Ⅰ(LABⅠ)、乳酸菌制剂Ⅱ(LABⅡ)、丙酸(PAT)、甲酸钠(SF)等6种添加剂对川西北虉草青贮品质的影响。结果表明:各添加剂均能够显著降低pH值(P<0.05);除PAT处理外,乳酸含量和乙酸含量显著增加(P<0.05);除SF处理外,其他各添加剂处理的氨态氮与总氮比值显著降低(P<0.05);各添加剂处理均能够提高虉草青贮饲料可溶性碳水化合物含量和粗蛋白含量,降低中、酸性洗涤纤维含量。各添加剂均能够改善虉草青贮饲料的发酵品质和营养价值,其中以LABⅡ(0.033 g·kg-1FM)的青贮效果最好。 In this study, Phalaris arundinacea L. with low water content (DM: 525.44 g·kg-1) was obtained as ensilaging materials to determine the effects of different additives (FS: FAST-SILE; lactobacillus Ⅰ : LAB Ⅰ ; lactobacillns Ⅱ : LAB Ⅱ ; propinonic acid, PAT; sodium format, SF) on the quality of silage. The results showed: comparing with the control group, treatment with additives can decrease the pYl of silages significantly (P〈O.05) , the lactic acid content and acetic acid content of additive treatment increased significantly (P〈0.05) , except for PAT, and the value of ammonia nitrogen/total nitrogen of additive treatment decreased significantly (P〈O.05) , except for SF; the soluble water carbohydrate content and crude protein content increased, while the neutral detergent fiber and acid detergent fiber decreased. It can be concluded that the selected additives can improve the fermentation quality and nutrient of P. arundinacea L. silages, and the best additive was LAB Ⅱ (0.033 g· kg-1 FM) .
出处 《草业与畜牧》 2013年第6期1-5,62,共6页 Pruataculture & Animal Husbandry
基金 国家公益性行业(农业)科研专项"牧区优质高效饲草生产利用技术研究示范"(201003023) 国家牧草产业技术体系阿坝综合试验站(CARS-35-35)资助
关键词 虉草 青贮 添加剂 发酵品质 Pholaris arundinacea L. Silage Additives Fermentation quality
  • 相关文献

参考文献32

  • 1张永亮,骆秀梅.虉草的研究进展[J].草地学报,2008,16(6):659-666. 被引量:43
  • 2Sahramaa M. Evaluating germpiasm of reed canarygrass, P. halaris arundinacea L[M]. Helsinki: University of Helsinki,2004. (http://ethes is. hel sinki. Fi/julkaisut/maa/sbiol/vk/ sahram aa). 被引量:1
  • 3周碧华.王连生.稿草生态生物学特性及其饲用价值的研究[J].中国草地,1988,(1):33-34. 被引量:1
  • 4张玉,张昌兵,李达旭,刘刚,游明鸿,白史且.“川草3号”虉草的区域试验研究[J].草业与畜牧,2007(11):9-14. 被引量:5
  • 5龙忠富,吴佳海,罗天琼,杨义成,孟军江.威宁草芦选育研究[J].贵州科学,2007,25(B05):515-520. 被引量:2
  • 6付为国,李萍萍,王纪章,卞新民.镇江河漫滩草地虉草光合特性研究[J].草地学报,2007,15(4):381-385. 被引量:17
  • 7Alan G Kaiser,Jothn W Piher,Helen M Burns,et al.Top fodder successful silage[M].The States of New South Wales : Dairy Australia and New South Wales Department of Primary Industries,2004 : 171. 被引量:1
  • 8Cazzato E, Laudadio V, Corleto A, et al. Effects of harvest date, wilting and inoculation on yield and forage quality of ensiling safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) biomass [J]. Journal of science food and agriculture, 2011,91 (12): 2298-2302. 被引量:1
  • 9Nishino N, Li Y, Wang C, et al. Effects of wilting and molasses addition on fermentation and bacterial community in guinea grass silage [J]. Letter of applied microbiology, 2012, 54(3): 175-181. 被引量:1
  • 10Hu W, Schmidt RJ, McDonell EE, Klingerman CM, et al. The effect of Lactobacillus buchneri 40788 or Lactobacillus plantarum MTD-1 on the fermentation and aerobic stability of corn silages ensiled at two dry matter contents [J]. Journal of dairy science, 2009.92(8): 3907-3914. 被引量:1

二级参考文献110

共引文献151

同被引文献148

引证文献8

二级引证文献40

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部