摘要
在医疗侵权损害诉讼中,实行的是医疗过错责任原则和举证责任倒置原则。在理论上,由于医疗机构能够以更低的成本防止损害和提供证据,过错责任原则可以有效地激励医生以合理的成本来减少过错产生的损害,而举证责任倒置则是一种收益最大化的责任分配方式。本文选取了国内两个案例和美国的一个案例进行分析和比较,指出在现实中,医疗过错责任已经演变成事实上的严格责任,这种严格化的趋势对医疗行为已经产生了过度威慑。为了更好地促进医患关系和谐,应严格区分医疗行为过错的性质,严格掌握归责原则,才能有效地降低医疗成本,缓解医患矛盾。
In medical tort lawsuit, Is the implementation of the principle of fault liability and the burden of proof in medical. It can effectively motivate doctors at a reasonable cost to reduce the fault caused damage and the burden of proof is the responsibility distribution pattern of a kind of profit maximization. Compare with two case in China and one case in American, we find that the medical fault liability, has become strict liability in the de facto. This strict trend has produced over deterrence to the medical behavior. In order to better promote the harmonious rela tionship between doctors and patients, we should strictly distinguish the nature of the fault in the medical and activi ty strict liability principle In order to effectively ease the contradiction between doctors and patients.
出处
《口腔医学研究》
CAS
CSCD
2013年第12期1179-1181,共3页
Journal of Oral Science Research
关键词
案例
医疗行为
过错责任
严格化趋势
过度威慑
t^xample of case The medical behavior Tort liability The strict tendency Excessive deterrence
