期刊文献+

From Democracy to Bureaucracy: The Baojia in Nationalist Thought and Practice, 1927-1949

From Democracy to Bureaucracy: The Baojia in Nationalist Thought and Practice, 1927-1949
原文传递
导出
摘要 In the 1939 New County Reforms, the Nationalist government made the baojia system the lowest level of self-government in the country. This decision was the result of more than ten years of discussion among Nationalist administrators and writers who were searching for a tutelary system to train the people in their political rights in preparation for constitutional rule. In the 1920s and 1930s, Nationalist writers claimed to be following Sun Zhongshan's (Sun Yat-sen) philosophy by reinventing the baojia as a form of democracy. Harkening back to a reimagined national past, they "discovered" that the imperial baojia was not a system of local control, but a traditional model of bureaucratically-designed local self-government. Nationalist writers dovetailed this new baojia with Sun Zhongshan's philosophy in order to rationalize its position as the foundation of the Three Principles of the People State. Once philosophically legitimized, Nationalist writers endorsed the baojia as a top-down bureaucratic system that would transform the political, social, and economic life of the country; it would become the core political unit of their state-making and nation-building projects. In so doing, the baojia came to represent the Nationalists' deeply-held belief in the power of human agency to create state institutions capable of entirely remaking society and transforming the nation. In the 1939 New County Reforms, the Nationalist government made the baojia system the lowest level of self-government in the country. This decision was the result of more than ten years of discussion among Nationalist administrators and writers who were searching for a tutelary system to train the people in their political rights in preparation for constitutional rule. In the 1920s and 1930s, Nationalist writers claimed to be following Sun Zhongshan's (Sun Yat-sen) philosophy by reinventing the baojia as a form of democracy. Harkening back to a reimagined national past, they "discovered" that the imperial baojia was not a system of local control, but a traditional model of bureaucratically-designed local self-government. Nationalist writers dovetailed this new baojia with Sun Zhongshan's philosophy in order to rationalize its position as the foundation of the Three Principles of the People State. Once philosophically legitimized, Nationalist writers endorsed the baojia as a top-down bureaucratic system that would transform the political, social, and economic life of the country; it would become the core political unit of their state-making and nation-building projects. In so doing, the baojia came to represent the Nationalists' deeply-held belief in the power of human agency to create state institutions capable of entirely remaking society and transforming the nation.
出处 《Frontiers of History in China》 2013年第4期517-557,共41页 中国历史学前沿(英文版)
关键词 baojia SELF-GOVERNMENT BUREAUCRACY state-making nation-building Nationalist Party Sun Zhongshan baojia, self-government, bureaucracy, state-making, nation-building,Nationalist Party, Sun Zhongshan
  • 相关文献

参考文献187

  • 1Lane J. Harris (Kl)History and Asian Studies Departments, Furman University, Greenville, SC 29613,USAE-mail: lane.harris@fUnnan.edu1Sun’s outline is frequently translated as “Outline of National Reconstruction.”. 被引量:1
  • 2Philip A. Kuhn, “Local Self-Government Under the Republic: Problems of Control,Autonomy, and Mobilization,” 286-87, and his “The Development of Local Government,”-45. 被引量:1
  • 3Sun Yat-sen, Fundamentals of National Reconstruction, 161. 被引量:1
  • 4John Fitzgerald, Awakening China: Politics, Culture, and Class in the NationalistRevolution. 被引量:1
  • 5Henrietta Harrison, The Making of the Republican Citizen: Political Ceremonies andSymbols in China, 1911-1929',for early Nationalist government efforts to recast therelationship between the state and society in an urban setting, see Michael Tsin, Nation,Governancey and Modernity in China: Canton, 1900—1927. 被引量:1
  • 6InWang Anshi’s baojia system ten households constituted a bao, fifty householdsconstituted a large bao (da bao), and ten large bao constituted a du bao\ at each leyel a headwas selected from the constituent members of the bao. For a general introduction to Wang’sNew Policies Reforms and the role of the baojia in them, see Paul Jakov Smith, “Shen-tsung,sReign and the New Policies of Wang An-shih, 1067-1085.”. 被引量:1
  • 7Onthe baojia in late imperial China, see Kung-chuan Hsiao, Rural China: Imperial Controlin the Nineteenth Century, 43-83; T’ung-tsu Chu, Local Government in China Under theCh’ing, 150-54; and John R. Watt, The District Magistrate in Late Imperial China, 185-93. 被引量:1
  • 8Huaiyin Li challenges the portrayal of the baojia as a form of state control of the ruralpopulation by arguing that Hsiao, Chu, and Watt were under the influence of the “orientaldespotism” paradigm, which made them view the imperial state as “despotic and penetrative.”. 被引量:1
  • 9Huaiyin Li,Village Governance in North China, 1875-1936, 6-7. 被引量:1
  • 10For an excellent overview of the debates between the feudal versus centralized model ofgovernment, see Min Tu-ki, National Polity and Local Power: The Transformation of LateImperial China, 89—112. 被引量:1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部