摘要
从近年国际体育仲裁院的案例来看,运动员主要从检测方法的科学性、阳性检测结果判定标准的科学性、检测程序的合规性等方面发起挑战,以求推翻阳性检测结果。其中,新检测方法可靠性的证明责任、检测资料未公开可否构成推翻检测结果的理由、阳性检测结果判定标准的设定是否科学、标准的确切意思、新的判定标准如何适用、程序的违反是否能导致阳性检测结果、检测是否具有再现性等是最常见的争议点。总的来看,国际体育仲裁院体现出了对新的检测技术和方法的支持鼓励、对检测技术和方法审查更为谨慎、对检测的不透明性较宽容的态度。这些案例启示,反兴奋剂机构应该对检测更为细致、加大检测资料的透明度、减轻运动员的证明责任。
Based on the jurisprudence of the court of arbitration for sport of recently years, the athletes mainly challenge the positive test result from the scientific of the test method and the criterion for determining the positive result and the departure from the regulated procedure. The dispute often rose from the burden of proof of the new test method＇s reliability, the scientific of the criterion for determining the positive result and the meaning of the criterion and the applying of the new criterion. There are also disputes concerning whether the departure from the regulated procedure could cause positive test result and whether the test has the reproducibility. Overall, the court of arbitration for sport encourages the new test technique and method, reviews the test tech- nique and method more carefully and tolerates to the untransparence of the test. It reminds the anti-doping agency should more carefully to the test, increase the transparency of the test and lesser the prove burden of the athletes.
出处
《天津体育学院学报》
CAS
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第5期396-401,共6页
Journal of Tianjin University of Sport
基金
国家社会科学基金项目(项目编号:11CFX076)
关键词
检测结果
兴奋剂
体育仲裁
test result
doping case
sport arbitration
