摘要
戴震的学术宗旨是"通经以明道",并在义理、考据和文章这三种学问之途上取得了世人瞩目的成就。然而,他对这三种学问之途所作出的那种高下、本末之分的治学态度却常常为时人学者们所诟病。考察他这种治学方法上的利弊得失对于我们矫正清代"经学"之弊以重开当代"经学"之新风气方面具有现实的借鉴意义。
The academic attainments of Dai Zhen consisted in ＂understanding Tao through studying sutra＂. It was Dai Zhen who re- ceived the outstanding achievement in three academic methods of interpretation, textual research and composition. Howeverj his coeval scholars always criticized his attitude towards academic research which these three academic methods should be distinguished between highness and lowness, ins and outs. Looking into his success and failure on the academic methods is very favorable for us to avoid the disadvantages of studying sutra in Dynasty Qing in order to ameliorate our academic research level in the contemporary era.
出处
《湘潭大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第6期147-149,共3页
Journal of Xiangtan University:Philosophy And Social Sciences
基金
湖南省社会科学规划课题"近代国民价值观的寻求对社会主义核心价值观的理论建构性研究"(编号:08YBB025)阶段性成果
关键词
义理
考据
文章
通经
明道
interpretation
textual research
composition
studying sutra
understanding Tao
