摘要
本文以范浚與秦檜、朱熹的關係爲切入點,探討國家政治、地方士紳、家族後人以及地域文化、道學機制等在范浚形象變遷中所起的作用;探討不同的敍述者,不同的敍述視角、利益訴求和隱秘欲望,如何造成了歷史的不同層面;進而探討道學譜系生成機制的若干問題。范浚對秦檜並無惡感,范浚因秦檜當國而辭賢良方正試之說是後人層累和增飾出來的;朱熹並未拜謁過范浚,世傳朱熹所撰《范子小傳》係僞作,朱熹對范浚《心箴》的引用亦屬斷章取義;范浚在南宋道學譜系中位置並不重要,從元代開始,隨着鄉賢士大夫對范浚的不斷推揚,范浚在金華區域文化中位置逐漸凸顯,但始終未能真正融入具有全國性影響的道學譜系中,道學譜系的生成,涉及道德的正當性、朝廷與地方及家族的助推、師承和傳受、思想的系統性與活力性等複雜因素。
This paper discusses the relationship of Fan Jun,Qin Hui and Zhu Xi as a starting point,in order to study how different factors created different aspects of history. These factors contained different narrators, various perspectives, demands of interest and ulterior motives. Fan Jun's image was shaped for many reasons such as national politics,local gentry,family descendants,regional culture and Daoxue pedigree. This paper points out that Fan Jun did not hate Qin Hui,and the statement that he did not take the exam because of Qin Hui was false. Zhu Xi never paid a formal visit to Fan Jun. It was generally believed that the writer of Biography of Fan Jun(《范子小傳》) was Zhu Xi,but actually it was not true. Zhu Xi quoted Fan Jun's Heart Proverbs(《心箴》) out of context. Fan Jun did not play an important part in Daoxue pedigree in Southern Song Dynasty. It was in Yuan Dynasty that Fan Jun became significant in Jinhua region because of the praise of local gentry,but he still could not get a nationwide effect. The formation of Daoxue pedigree was complicated. It was affected by many factors such as praise of government,respect of local gentry, promotion of family descendants, succession, personality,and a systematic and vibrant theory.
出处
《中华文史论丛》
CSSCI
2013年第4期59-85,共27页
Journal of Chinese Literature and History
基金
浙江省江南文化研究中心重點課題"宋代范浚及其宗族考論"成果之一