期刊文献+

战术导弹多目标多学科设计优化 被引量:4

Multiobjective Multidisciplinary Design Optimization of Missile
原文传递
导出
摘要 为了对导弹进行多学科设计优化(MDO),建立了包含气动、推进、质量、控制和弹道的多学科分析模型,并采用协作优化对战术导弹多目标多学科设计优化问题进行了表述。针对多目标多学科优化设计问题的计算复杂性,提出了一种新的处理约束多目标优化问题的基于Kriging多目标遗传算法(MOKGA)。MOKGA采用物理规划法将多目标优化转化为单目标优化,然后构建目标函数的考虑约束的EI(Expected Improvement)模型,并采用遗传算法进行求解。将MOKGA与多目标优化算法NSGA-II进行了比较。结果表明,NSGA-II和MOKGA两种算法的优化结果均较初始方案得到明显改进,但MOKGA的精确分析次数较NSGA-II减少了40%,降低了多学科设计优化问题求解过程中的计算复杂性。 In order to design missiles with multidisciplinary design optimization (MDO), multidisciplinary analysis models are established which involve such diverse fields as aerodynamics, propulsion, mass, control and trajectory. Collaborative optimization is adopted to formulate the MDO of a missile. Due to the computational complexity of the MDO problem, a new method dealing with constrained multiobjective optimization is proposed, which is multiobjective Kriging based genetic algo- rithm (MOKGA). Physical programming is used in the method to convert the multiobjective to a single objective, and then El (Expected Improvement) is made for the single objective taking into consideration the various constraints. Genetic algorithm is used to optimize the El. Comparison between the multiobjective genetic algorithm NSGA-II and MOKGA is made. The re- sults show that the optimized results of both methods are improved as compared with the initial design, but that MOKGA re- duces by 40% the number of exact analyses as compared with NSGA-II, which reduces remarkably the computational com- plexity of multidisciplinary design optimization.
出处 《航空学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第11期2557-2564,共8页 Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica
关键词 导弹 多学科设计优化 多目标 遗传算法 物理规划 missile multidisciplinary design optimization multiobjective genetic algorithm physical programming
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献38

  • 1陈刚,徐敏,万自明,陈士橹.基于多学科设计优化算法的再入轨迹优化设计[J].宇航学报,2006,27(6):1147-1151. 被引量:4
  • 2Hongbing Fang, Mark F. Horstemeyer. Metamodeling with Radial Basis Funetions[J ]. 46th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics & Materials Confer18 - 21 April 2005, Austin, Texas,AIAA 2005 - 2059. 被引量:1
  • 3Timothy W. Simpson, Timothy M. Mauery, John J. Korte, Farrokh Mistree. comparison of response surface and kriging models for multidiseiplinary design optimization[ J ]. AIAA - 98 - 4755. 381 - 391. 被引量:1
  • 4T. Krishnamurthy, V. J. Romero, Construction of Response Surface with Higher Order Continuity and its Application to Reliability [ J ]. 43rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Con22 - 25 April 2002, Denver, Colorado, AIAA 2002 - 1466. 被引量:1
  • 5Soren N. Lophaven, Hans Braun Nidsen, Jacob Sondergaard. "DACE A Matlab Kriging Toolbox." Report IMM - REP - 2002 - 13, Informatics and Mathematical Modeling. Technical University of Denmark, 2002 [ EB/OL]. http://www, imm. dtu. dk/-- hbn/dace/. 被引量:1
  • 6Perez R, Liu H, Behdinan K. Evaluation of Multidisciplinary Optimization Approaches for Aircraft Conceptual Design [ R]. AIAA 2004 -4537,2004. 被引量:1
  • 7Perez R, Liu H, Behdinan K. Flight Dynamics and Control Muhidisciplinary Integration in Aircraft Conceptual Design Optimization [ R ]. AIAA 2004 - 4435,2004. 被引量:1
  • 8Yu X Q,AIAA 98-4917,Missouri:AIAA,1998年 被引量:1
  • 9Korte J J,AGARD Interpanel ( FDP+ PEP) Symposium "Future AerospaceTechnology in the Ser,1997年 被引量:1
  • 10Dudley J,AIAA 95-0124,Nevada:AIAA,1995年 被引量:1

共引文献166

同被引文献73

引证文献4

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部