摘要
根据1998—2011年的面板数据,运用DEA-SBM模型和DEA-CCR模型测度我国西部11个省区的工业环境效率和经济效率,结果表明:DEA-SBM模型较好地处理了非期望产出问题,测度的工业环境效率比DEA-CCR模型测度的工业经济效率更客观、真实;我国西部工业没有达到最佳的生产前沿;西部地区工业环境效率与经济效率的差距在1998—2007年逐渐缩小,但在2007—2011年有所扩大;环境污染对西部各省区的工业环境效率影响具有地区差异,其中,内蒙古、陕西、青海、宁夏四省区工业环境效率与经济效率的差距较大,工业与环境的协调度也较低。西部地区应加快转变工业增长方式,优化产业转移,合理配置资源,缓解工业与环境的矛盾。
According to the panel data of 11 provinces in the west part of China during 1998-2011, the industrial environment efficiency and the economic efficiency of each province in the west part of China are measured by DEA-SBM Model and DEA-CCR Model, and the results show that DEA-SBM Model better solves unexpected output problem, that the industrial environment efficiency measured by DEA-SBM Model is more objective and practical than the economic efficiency measured by DEA-CCR Model, that the industry in the west part of China does not reach the optimal production frontier, that the difference between the industrial environment efficiency and the economic efficiency in the west part of China gradually narrows during 1998-2007 but enlarges during 2007-2011, that there is regional difference in the influence of environment pollution on the industrial environment efficiency of each province in the west part of China, among which, there is big difference between the industrial environment efficiency and the economic efficiency in Inner Mongolia, Shaanxi, coordination degree between industry and environment. The west part industrial growth mode, optimize industrial transfer, reasonably allocate between industry and environment. Qinghai and Ningxia, and there is low of China should accelerate the change of the resources and mitigate the contradiction
出处
《西部论坛》
2013年第6期90-96,共7页
West Forum
基金
国家社会科学基金青年项目(11CMZ006)
关键词
工业环境效率
工业经济效率
非期望产出
污染排放
工业与环境协调度
DEA
SBM模型
DEA—CCR模型
产业转移
西部地区
industrial environmentalemission
coordination degree betweentransfer
west part of Chinaefficiency
industrial economic efficiency
unexpectedindustry and environment
DEA-SBM Model
DEA-CCRoutput
pollutionModel
industrial
