期刊文献+

WAY构式的语法化历程探讨 被引量:17

原文传递
导出
摘要 英语的way构式义为"定向创路前行"。通过文献和语料库调查,本研究关于此构式的历时演进有如下发现:1)早期构式中的"way"有实义,旁格不必出现;而当前的"way"义抽象化,旁格必现;2)与早期构式不同,当前构式压制并整合很多参与动词的题元组配;3)此构式的历时演进是个扩容过程,早期的三个动词句群发生变异或趋于萎缩,而当前构式中有十二个动词句群。考察结论为早期的构式义具体,当前的构式义抽象;构式演变及其句法变异的动因是语用需求和语义迁变。将构式语法与语法化理论相结合能对构式演变作出较好的描述和解释。 The way construction entails that the subject referent moves along a self-created path towards the destination. By way of literature review and corpus investigation, the present study has obtained the following findings on its diachronic chan- ges. First, the OBL phrase is not obligatory in the early-day construction with way in its concrete meaning, whereas the phrase must co-appear with the abstract meaning of way in the present-day construction. Second, different from its early days, the construction coerces and integrates the thematic roles of the participating verbs. Finally, the diachronic evolution of the con- struction has witnessed a process of category expansion, in which the three original clusters of verbs vary or shrink and twelve clusters of verbs have found their way to the present-day construction. Our survey has reached the conclusion that the seman- tics of the early-day construction is concrete while that of the present-day one quite general and that it is the pragmatic require- ment and semantic variation that result in the construction evolution as well as its syntactic changes. Diachronic evolution of such constructions can be better described and explained by the combination of Construction Grammar and Theory of Grammati- calization.
作者 张建理 徐银
出处 《外语教学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第6期1-6,共6页 Foreign Language Education
关键词 认知构式语法 语言演变 语法化 多义性 way构式 Cognitive Construction Grammar language evolution grammaticalization polysemy way
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Bergs, A. & G. Diewald. Introduction: Constructions and language change[ A]. In A. Bergs & G. Diewald( eds. ). Constructions and Language Change [ C ]. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 2008 : 1-5. 被引量:1
  • 2Fried, M. Constructions and constructs: Mapping a shift between predication and attribution[ A]. In A. Bergs & G. Diewald(eds. ). Constructions and Language Change [ C ]. Berlin & New York : Mou- ton de Gruyter, 2008: 49-74. 被引量:1
  • 3Goldberg, A. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Ar- gument Structure [ M ]. Chicago : The University of Chicago Press, 1995. 被引量:1
  • 4Gyori, G. Historical aspects of categorization [ A ]. In E. H. Casad (ed.). Cognitive Linguistics in the Redwoods: The Expansion of a New Paradigm in Linguistics [ C ]. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 1995: 175-205. 被引量:1
  • 5Hopper, P. & E. Traugott. Grammaticalization[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993. 被引量:1
  • 6Israel, M. The way constructions grow[ A ]. In A. Goldberg( ed. ). Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language [ C ]. Stanford : CSLI Publications, 1996: 217-230. 被引量:1
  • 7Mondorf, B. Variation and change in English resultative constructions [ J ]. Language Variation and Change, 2011 ( 22 ) : 397-421. 被引量:1
  • 8Sullivan, K. Grammar in metaphor[ D]. Ph. D. Dissertation. Berke- ley : University of California, 2007. 被引量:1
  • 9Ungerer, F. & H. Schmid. An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics [M]. London: Longman, 1996. 被引量:1
  • 10艾森克M.W.&M.T.基恩.认知心理学(第五版)[M].高定国,何凌南,等,译.上海:华东师范大学出版社,2009. 被引量:1

二级参考文献57

  • 1张建理.英汉双宾语句认知对比研究[J].外国语,2006,29(6):28-33. 被引量:55
  • 2王文斌.论隐喻构建的主体自洽[J].外语教学,2007,28(1):5-10. 被引量:20
  • 3覃胜勇.从语言的隐喻性看动词述谓结构[J].南华大学学报(社会科学版),2007,8(3):102-104. 被引量:1
  • 4Bybee, J. 2003. Cognitive processes in grammaticalization [A]. In M. Tomaselo (ed.). The New Psychology of Language : Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure. Vol. 2 [C]. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. 145-167. 被引量:1
  • 5Croft, W. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective [M]. Oxford: OUP. 被引量:1
  • 6Fried, M. & H. Boas (eds.). 2005. Grammatical Constructions: Back to the Roots [C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 被引量:1
  • 7Fried, M. &J.O stman (eds.). 2005. Construction Grammar: In a Cross-language Perspective [C]. Amsterdam.. John Benjamins. 被引量:1
  • 8Goldberg, A. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure [M]. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 被引量:1
  • 9Goldberg, A. 2006. Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language [M]. Oxford: OUP. 被引量:1
  • 10Himmelmann, N. 2004. Lexicalization and grammaticalization: Opposite or orthogonal? EA]. In W. Bisang et al. (eds.). What Makes Grammaticalization ? [C]. Berlin.. Mouton de Gruyter. 21-42. 被引量:1

共引文献44

同被引文献132

引证文献17

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部