期刊文献+

论“夫妻约定冠姓制”的废除 被引量:3

On the Abolishion of the Consensus-Based Re-Surname System Between Spouses
下载PDF
导出
摘要 新中国婚姻法其实也允许夫妻双方约定一方冠以对方的姓氏,但这一规定应该废除。主要理由是:第一,中国古代妻子在习惯上被正式称为"某氏"、"阿某"、"某某氏"或"某阿某",原因在于提高行政效率,凸显男女家庭法律地位的不平等。目前,我国的相关规定禁止简化身份登记、实行男女平等。第二,夫妻约定冠姓制虽达到法律上的男女平等,但发达国家的实践表明,并未带来事实上的男女平等。第三,若夫妻一方行使这一权利,则会给国家、当事人、文化观念带来严重的消极影响。第四,法国、加拿大魁北克省、比利时、荷兰、美国路易斯安那州均要求夫妻保持本姓。 The practice of the consensus-based re-surname system between spouses is not prohibited according to the China' s Marriage Law. The stipulation shall be abolished with the reasons as thefollowing : (1) Wives in the ancient China would be formally addressed as Ms X (X stands for the surname of her husband), for the inequality of the legal status between man and woman in the family and also for the improvement of the administrative efficiency. (2)Ahhough theconsesus-based re-surname system would contribute to the promotion of the legal equality between man and woman, the practice in the developed countries have proved otherwise, it doesn't result in the equality between man and woman in real term. (3) If this right is exercised by spouses, it would have the detrimental effect on the country, spouses and cultural mentality. (4) It is required that the spouses shall retain their original surname in the France, Quebec in the Canada, Belgium, Holland, and the State of Louisiana in U.S.A.
作者 张学军
出处 《中华女子学院学报》 2013年第5期5-14,共10页 Journal of China Women's University
基金 教育部2009年规划课题项目"侵权责任法视阈下的夫妻关系保护研究"的阶段性成果 项目编号:09YJA820073
关键词 夫妻约定冠姓 男女平等 比较法 consensus-based re-surname system between spouses social reasons equality between man andwoman social effect comparative law
  • 相关文献

参考文献34

  • 1滋贺秀三.中国家族法原理[M].北京:法律出版社,2003. 被引量:34
  • 2戴东雄."民国八十七年"民法亲属编有关夫妻冠姓与夫妻住所修正之检讨[J].法学丛刊,2000,(3). 被引量:1
  • 3刘素萍主编,王卫东编选..婚姻法学参考资料[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1989:479.
  • 4王胜明,孙礼海主编,全国人大常委会法制工作委员会民法室编..《中华人民共和国婚姻法》修改立法资料选[M].北京:法律出版社,2001:544.
  • 5戴炎辉 戴东雄.中国亲属法[M].台北:三民书局,1988.. 被引量:4
  • 6戴东雄主编..民法亲属继承论文选辑[M],1984:624.
  • 7陈棋炎.民法亲属[M].台北:三民书局,1984. 被引量:2
  • 8Carolyn Hamilton, Kate Standley and David Hodson. Family Law in Europe[C].Holland: Butterworths,1995. 被引量:1
  • 9Peter Gottwald,Dieter Schwab and Eva Biittner.Family and Succession Law in Germany[M].Kluwer Law International,2001. 被引量:1
  • 10Kif Augustine-Adams.The Beginning of Wisdom is to Call Things by Their Right Names[J].7 Southern California Review of Law and Women' s Studies 1,Fall, 1997. 被引量:1

二级参考文献33

共引文献58

同被引文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部