期刊文献+

不同浓度罗哌卡因联合芬太尼行硬膜外分娩镇痛的量效观察 被引量:7

Fentanyl combined with varying concentrations of ropivacaine in labor epidural analgesia
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨罗哌卡因联合芬太尼行硬膜外分娩镇痛的最佳有效浓度。方法选择120例初产妇接受L2-3硬膜外穿刺置管拟行分娩镇痛.按随机数字表法分为0.15%罗哌卡因联合1ug/ml芬太尼(F1组)、0.12%罗哌卡因联合1ug/ml芬太尼(F2组)、0.10%罗哌卡因联合1ug/ml芬太尼(F3组)及0.08%罗哌卡因联合1ug/ml芬太尼(F4组)。监测镇痛过程中阻滞平面和运动阻滞发生情况、VAS、缩富素使用增加例数等。结果F1、F2组运动神经阻滞发生的例数多于F3、F4组(P〈0.05)。F1组缩宫素使用增加例数多于其它3组(P〈0.05)。不同罗哌卡因浓度比较,F4组起效时间最长,明显长于F1、F2、F3组(P〈0.05)。F4组给药后30、60、90min时的VAS明显高于F1、F2、F3组,停药时的VAS明显高于F1组(P〈0.05)。F4组镇痛后30min内第3次宫缩开始每次宫缩对应的VAS明显高于F1、F2、F3组(P〈0.05)。结论罗哌卡因联合1ug/ml芬太尼用于分娩镇痛时,010%是最佳有效浓度,镇痛效果好,运动阻滞轻,安全性高。 Objective To investigate the optimal concentration of ropivacaine combined with fentanyl in labor epidural analgesia. Methods One hundred and twenty nulliparous women undergoing labor for delivery with epidural analgesia were randomized into four groups. Group F1 received 0.15% ropivacaine plus fentanyl 1μg/ml, group F2 0.12% ropivacaine plus fen- tanyl 1μg/ml, group F3 0.10% ropivacaine plus fentanyl 1μg/ml, group F4 0.08% ropivacaine plus fentanyl 1μg/ml. The block levels of epidural analgesia, the Bromage scores, Ramsey scores, fetal heart rate and uterine contraction in the course of labor were monitored; in addition, onset time of anesthesia, labor time, the cases with increased oxytocin use, visual analogue scale(VAS), Apgar scores of neonates and side-effect were also recorded. Results There were more cases with motor nerve block in groups F1 and F2 than those in groups F3 and F4 (P〈0.05). There were more cases with increased oxytocin use in group F1 than other three groups (P〈0.05). The onset of anesthesia was in group F4 was significantly longer than that in another three groups (P〈0.05). The VAS scores at 30, 60 and 90min after injection in groupF4 was significantly higher than those in other three groups (P〈0.05), and when drug withdraw the VAS in group F4 was significantly higher than groupF1 (P〈0.05). Conclusion 0.10% ropivacaine combined with fentanyl 1μg/ml is the optimal dose with less motor block and high safety for epidural analgesia in la- bor.
出处 《浙江医学》 CAS 2013年第19期1748-1751,共4页 Zhejiang Medical Journal
关键词 罗哌卡因 芬太尼 分娩镇痛 Ropivacaine Fentanyl Labor analgesia
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1姚尚龙,夏磊铭.新型长效局麻药在分娩镇痛中的研究进展[J].广东医学,2006,27(11):1604-1605. 被引量:4
  • 2庄心良等主编..现代麻醉学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2003:66.
  • 3Bang E C, Lee H S, Kang Y I, et al. Onset of labor epidural anal- gesia with ropivacaine and a varying dose of fentanyl: a random- ized controlled trial[J]. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthe- sia. 2012. 21: 45-50. 被引量:1
  • 4Fun W, Lew E,Sia A T. Advances in neuraxial blocks for labor anal- gesia: new techniques, new systems[J], Minerva Anestesiol, 2008, 74(3):77-85. 被引量:1
  • 5Stewart A, Fernando R. Maternal ambulation during labor[J]. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol, 2011, 24(3):268-273. 被引量:1
  • 6Hawkins J L. Epidural Analgesia for Labor and Delivery[J]. N Engl J Med, 2010, 362(16):1503-1510. 被引量:1
  • 7Beilin Y. An update on obstetric anesthesia[J]. Semin Cardiotho- rac Vasc Anesth, 2010, 14(1):64-65. 被引量:1
  • 8Boulier V, Gomis P, Lautner C, et al. Minimum local analgesic con- centrations of ropivacaine and levobupivacaine with sufentanil for epidural analgesia in labour[J]. Int J Obstet Anesth, 2009, 18(3): 226-230. 被引量:1
  • 9Cambic C R, Wong C A. Labour analgesia and obstetric outcomes [J]. Br J Anaesth, 2010, 105:50-60. 被引量:1
  • 10Bakhamees H, Hegazy E. Does epidural increase the incidence of cesarean delivery or instrumental labor in Saudi populations [J]? Middle East J Anesthesiol, 2007, 19(3):693-704. 被引量:1

二级参考文献19

  • 1SHMUEL EVRON,MAREK GLEZERMAN,OSCAR SADAN,et al.Patient-controlled epidural analgesia for labor pain:effect on labor,delivery and neonatal outcome of 0.125% bupivacaine vs 0.2% ropivacaine[J].Int J Obstet Anesth,2004,13:5-10. 被引量:1
  • 2GOGARTEN W,VAN DE VELDE V,SOETENS F,et al.A multicentre trial comparing different concentrations of ropivacaine plus sufentanil with bupivacaine plus sufentanil for patient-controlled epidural analgesia in labour[J].Eur J Anaesthesiol,2004,21:38-45. 被引量:1
  • 3HALPERN S H,BREEN T W,CAMPBELL D C,et al.A multicenter,randomized,controlled trial comparing bupivacaine with ropivacaine for labor analgesia[J].Anesthesiology,2003,98:1 431 -1 435. 被引量:1
  • 4MCLEOD G A,BURKE D.Levobupivacaine[J].Anaesthesia,2001,56:331-341. 被引量:1
  • 5CONVERY P,BURKE D,MCLEOD G A,et al.Continuous infusion of levobupivacaine and bupivacaine in patients in labour-a comparison[J].Intl J Obstet Anesth,1999,8:196-197. 被引量:1
  • 6PURDIE N L,MCGRADY E M.Comparison of patient-controlled epidural bolus administration of 0.1% ropivacaine and 0.1% levobupivacaine,both with 0.000 2% fentanyl,for analgesia during labour[J].Anaesthesia,2004,59(2):133-137. 被引量:1
  • 7SOETENS F M,SOETENS M A,VERCAUTEREN M P.Levobupivacaine-sufentanil with or without epinephrine during epidural labor analgesia[J].Anesth Analg,2006,103(1):182-186. 被引量:1
  • 8BOSELLI E,DEBON R,CIMINO Y,et al.Background infusion is not beneficial during labor patient-controlled analgesia with 0.1% ropivacaine plus 0.5 microg/ml sufentanil[J].Anesthesiology,2004,100:968-972. 被引量:1
  • 9CAMPBELL D C,BREENTW,HALPERN S H,et al RCT comparing the efficacy of PCEA alone vs PCEA t CIEA for ambulatory labor analgesia[J].Anesthesiology,2004,101:A1 210. 被引量:1
  • 10CAMPBELL D C,BREEN T W,HALPERN S H,et al.RCT comparing the effect of PCEA vies PCEA t CIEA on labor outcome[J].Anesthesiology,2004,101:A1204. 被引量:1

共引文献3

同被引文献71

  • 1陈自励,何锐智,彭倩,郭可瑜,张玉琼,袁惠华.脐动脉血气在新生儿窒息诊断中的意义和价值[J].中华围产医学杂志,2006,9(1):24-27. 被引量:59
  • 2徐建国,沈晓凤,唐跃,陈新中,贾真,甘树媛,金毅.不同浓度舒芬太尼或芬太尼对硬膜外罗哌卡因分娩镇痛效应的影响[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2007,27(7):599-602. 被引量:31
  • 3Kuthiala G,Chaudhary G.Ropivacaine:a review of its pharmacology and clinical use[J].Indian J Anaesth,2011,55 (2):104-110. 被引量:1
  • 4Beilin Y,Halpern S.Focused review:ropivacaine versus bupivacaine for epidural labor analgesia[J].Anesth Analg,2010,111 (2):482-487. 被引量:1
  • 5Shen BJ,Farrell KA,Penedo FJ,et al.Waist circumference moderates the association between marital stress and C-reactive protein in middle-aged healthy women[J].Ann Behav Med,2010,40 (3):258-264. 被引量:1
  • 6Gialloreti LE,Merito M,Pezzotti P,et al.Epidemiology and economic burden of herpes zoster and post-herpetic neuralgia in Italy:a retrospective,population-based study[J].BMC Infect Dis,2010,10:230-230. 被引量:1
  • 7Naja ZM,Maaliki H,AI-Tannir MA,et al.Repetitive paravertebral nerve block using a catheter technique for pain relief in post-herpetic neuralgia[J].Br J Anaesth,2006,96:381-383. 被引量:1
  • 8Bauer ME, Kountanis JA, Tsen LC, et al. Risk factors for failed conversion of labor epidural analgesia to cesarean delivery anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational trials [ J ]. Int J Obstet Anesth, 2012, 21 (4) : 294-309. 被引量:1
  • 9Lindow SW, Dhillon AR, Husaini SW, et al. A randomised double-blind comparison of epidural fentanyl versus fentauyl and bupivicaine for pain relief in the second stage of labour [J] .BJOG, 2004, 111 (10): 1075-1080. 被引量:1
  • 10Moises EC, de Barros Duarte L, de Carvalho Cavalli R, et al. Pharmacokinetics and transplacental distribution of fentanyl in epidural anesthesia for normal pregnant women [J] . Eur.l Clin Pharmacol. 2005, 61 (7): 517-522. 被引量:1

引证文献7

二级引证文献57

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部