期刊文献+

单纯经皮腔内血管成形术与支架置入术治疗中短段股腘动脉硬化闭塞症疗效及安全性Meta分析 被引量:3

Simple percutaneous transluminal angioplasty versus primary stent placement in treating short-intermediate superficial femoral-popliteal artery occlusive disease about clinical safety and efficacy:A Meta-analysis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的应用Meta分析一期支架置入术(stentimplantation,ST)和单纯经皮腔内血管成形术(percutaneoustransluminalangioplasty,PTA)治疗股胭动脉闭塞性疾病的疗效及安全性。方法选取1993年1月至2013年1月发表的9篇前瞻性随机对照研究(RCT),比较ST和PTA的临床疗效,应用Meta分析评价手术成功率、术后再狭窄率、靶血管再干预率等相关指标。结果共有9篇前瞻性随机对照研究纳入此分析,包括948例病人971条肢体,ST组489条,PTA组482条。ST组手术成功率高于PTA组,差异有统计学意义(OR=7.02,95%CI3.83~12.86,P〈0.001);术后12个月血管再狭窄率ST组低于VrA组,差异有统计学意义(OR=0.58,95%C10.38~0.89,P=0.01),术后24个月血管再狭窄率比较差异无统计学意义(OR=0.82,95%C10.55~1.24,P=0.35)。两组术后靶血管再干预率、血管并发症发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论对于中短段股胭动脉闭塞性病变(≤15cm),ST近期疗效优于PTA,但是没有充足的证据证明ST组的远期(≥24个月)疗效及安全性优于PTA组。 Objective To compare the clinical safety and efficacy of primary stent placement (ST) versus simple percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (FFA) in treating superficial femoral-popliteal artery (SFPA) occlusive disease using Meta-analysis method. Methods Prospective randomized controlled trials (RCT)comparing ST and PTA clinical effects published from January 1993 to January 2013 were retrieved. A Meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the immediate operation success rate, postoperative restenosis rate, target vessel revascularization (TVR). Results A total of 9 RCT were included in the analysis, including 948 patients and 971 limbs, 489 limbs in ST group and 482 limbs in PTA group. The immediate operation success rate was higher in the ST group and the difference was significant statistically (OR=7.02, 95% CI 3.83-12.86, P〈0.001). Postoperative 12 months vascular restenosis rates in ST group were less than those in PTA group with significant difference (OR-0.58,95%CI 0.38-0.89, P=0.01 ). The difference of postoperative 24 months vascular restenosis rates between two groups was not significant statistically (OR=0.82,95%CI 0.55-1.24, P=0.35). There was no difference statistically in target vessel revascularization and vascular complications between two groups (P〉0.05). Conclusion For short-intermediate SFPA occlusion lesions (less than 15era), short-term outcomes of ST is better than the PTA. But there is not enough evidence to prove that long-term outcome (longer than 24 months) of ST group is better than the PTA group.
出处 《中国实用外科杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2013年第11期974-978,共5页 Chinese Journal of Practical Surgery
关键词 周围血管疾病 支架置入术 经皮腔内血管成形术 META分析 peripheral vascular disease stents implantation percutaneous transluminal angioplasty Meta-analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? [J]. Control Clin Trials, 1996, 17(1): 1-12. 被引量:1
  • 2Vroegindeweij D, Vos LD, Tielbeek AV, et al. Balloon angioplas- ty combined with primary stenting versus balloon angioplasty alone in femoropopliteal obstructions: A comparative randomized study [ J ]. C ardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 1997, 20(6) : 420-425. 被引量:1
  • 3Zdanowski Z, Albrechtsson U, Lundin A, et al. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with or without stenting for femoropop- liteal occlusions? A randomized controlled study [J]. Int Angio|, 1999, 18(4):251-255. 被引量:1
  • 4Grimm J, Muller-Hulsbeck S, Jahnke T, et al. Randomized study to compare PTA alone versus PTA with Palmaz stent placement for femoropopliteal lesions [J]. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2001, 12 (8) : 935-942. 被引量:1
  • 5Cejna M, Thurnher S, Illiasch H, et al. PTA versus Palmaz stent placement in femoropoplitcal artery obstructions: a multicentcr prospective randomized study[J]. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2001, 12 (1) : 23-31. 被引量:1
  • 6Saxon RR, Coffman JM, Gooding JM, et al. Long-term results of ePTFE stent-graft versus angioplasty in the femoropopliteal ar- tery: single center experience from a prospective, randomized tri- al[J-. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2003, 14(3):303-311. 被引量:1
  • 7Becquemin JP, Favre JP, Marzelle J, et al. Systematic versus se- lective stent placement after superficial femoral artery balloon angioplasty: a muhicenter prospective randomized study [J]. J Vasc Surg, 2003, 37(3):487-494. 被引量:1
  • 8Schillinger M, Sabeti S, Loewe C, et al. Balloon angioplasty ver- sus implantation of nitinol stents in the superficial femoral artery [J]. N Engl J Med, 2006, 354(18): 1879-1888. 被引量:1
  • 9Krankenberg H, Schluter M, Steinkamp H J, et al. Nitinol stent implantation versus percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in su- perficial femoral artery lesions up to 10 cm in length: the femoral artery stenting trial (FAST) [J]. Circulation, 2007, 116(3): 285-292. 被引量:1
  • 10Dick P, Wallner H, Sabeti S, et al. Balloon angioplasty versus stenting with nitinol stents in intermediate length superficial femoral artery lesions [J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2009, 74 (7): 1090-1095. 被引量:1

二级参考文献38

  • 1蒋米尔,陆民,黄新天,张培华.分期静脉动脉化治疗肢体动脉广泛性闭塞的评价[J].中国现代普通外科进展,2001,4(3):170-172. 被引量:22
  • 2Nevelsteen A,Wouters L,Suy R. Aortofemoral Dacron reconstruction for aorto-iliac occlusive disease: A 25-year survey. EurJ VascSurg, 1991,5(2): 179-186 被引量:1
  • 3Vries SO,Hunink MG. Results of aortic bifurcation grafts for aortoiliac occlusive disease: a meta-analysis. J Vasc Surg, 1997,26 (4):558-569 被引量:1
  • 4Bergamini TM, Towne JB, Bandyk DF, et al. Experience with in situ saphenous vein bypasses during 1981 to 1989: Determinant factors of long-term patency. J Vasc Surg, 1991,13( 1 ): 137-147 被引量:1
  • 5Taylar LM, Edwards JM, Porter JM. Present status of reversed vein bypass grafting: Five-year results of a modem series. J Vasc Surg, 1990,11 (2): 193-205 被引量:1
  • 6Harrington EB, Harrington ME, Schanzer H, et al. The dorsalispedis bypass:Moderate success in difficult situations. J Vasc Surg,1992,15 (2): 409-414 被引量:1
  • 7Shah DM,Darling RC, Chang BB, et al. Is long vein bypass from groin to ankle a durable procedure? An analysis of a ten-year experience. J Vasc Surg, 1992,15 (2): 402-407 被引量:1
  • 8Andros G, Harris RW, Salles-Cunha SX,et al. Bypass grafts to the ankle and foot. J Vasc Surg,1988,7(6):785-794 被引量:1
  • 9Quinones-Baldrich WJ, Prego AA, Ucelay-Gomez R, et al. Longterm results of infrainguinal revascularization with polytetrafluoroethylene: a ten-year experience. J Vasc Surg, 1992, 16 ( 2 ):209-217 被引量:1
  • 10Whittemore AD, Kent KC, Donaldson MC, et al. What is the proper role of polytetrafluoroethylene grafts in infrainguinal reconstruction? J Vasc Surg, 1989,10(3) :299-305 被引量:1

共引文献8

同被引文献21

引证文献3

二级引证文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部