期刊文献+

美国十所大学图书馆绩效评估现状研究 被引量:6

Research on the Performance Assessment of Ten U.S. University Libraries
下载PDF
导出
摘要 高校图书馆一向被喻为高校的心脏,在高校中处于核心地位。从学术研究的角度看,高校图书馆是学术资源中心,同时也是学术支持中心。高校图书馆应该认清自己的核心价值,为高校师生教学科研提供支持。文章对美国10所著名大学图书馆绩效评估现状进行研究,对各图书馆绩效评估的目标、评估主体、评估方法、评估指标、评估效益进行全面、深入的分析和研究,目的是为我国高校图书馆绩效评估实施提供参考。 University library has always been hailed as the heart of the university. From the academic research point of view, it is the academic resource center and the academic support center on the campus. The university libraries should identify their owri core values, and provide all kinds of information to assist the teaching and scientific research of teachers and students. This paper selects 10 American university libraries as the research objects and studies their performance evaluation respectively, analyzing the objects, main contents, methods, indicators and the benefits of their assessment, in hope of providing reference for the university library performance evaluation in China.
出处 《图书馆论坛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第6期44-50,共7页 Library Tribune
基金 广东省自然科学基金"大学院系绩效管理理论与体系研究:基于核心竞争力视角"(项目编号:S2011010003417)阶段性研究成果之一
关键词 绩效评估 高校图书馆 美国 performance assessment university library The United State
  • 相关文献

参考文献38

  • 1American library association. Standards for university libraries: evaluation of performance [J]. IFLA journal, 2004: 1-15. 被引量:1
  • 2Butler, H. J. HBLL user studies and assessment team (USAT) charge[EB/OL]. (2011-09 -21]. https: // intranet, lib. byu. edu/intranet/index, php/User _ Studies _ and Assessment. 被引量:1
  • 3Team. ISO. Information and documentation-library performance indicators [S]. ISO 11620. 1998:4 -6. 被引量:1
  • 4张红霞著..图书馆质量评估体系与国标标准[M].北京:北京图书馆出版社,2008:264.
  • 5Sharpening our vision the Duke University libraries' strategic plan for 2010 2012. 被引量:1
  • 6Current and planned assessment projects [EB/OL]. (2011-07-22). http: //research. library, cornell, edu/ currentassessment. 被引量:1
  • 7Hiller, S. Assessing user needs, satisfaction and library performance at the university of Washington libraries [J]. Library trends, 2001, 49 (4): 605-625. 被引量:1
  • 8邓珞华,周欣平.中美两国高校图书馆管理之比较[J].大学图书馆学报,2001,19(1):5-11. 被引量:155
  • 9袁明英.高校图书馆绩效评估指标体系及方法[J].图书馆学刊,2005,27(5):24-26. 被引量:17
  • 10余海宪.电子资源绩效评估初探[J].高校图书馆工作,2006,26(1):33-35. 被引量:12

二级参考文献19

共引文献183

同被引文献57

  • 1钟一环.浅探基于平衡计分卡的高校图书馆绩效评价指标[J].图书情报工作,2011,55(S2):85-87. 被引量:8
  • 2何琳,彭小平.我国图书馆绩效评价研究综述[J].图书馆学研究(应用版),2010(8):17-21. 被引量:23
  • 3大学图书馆基准.大学基准协会[EB/OL].[2014-12-11]. http://www.lb.nagasaki-u.ac.jp/about/pdf/arikata__ref_2.pdf. 被引量:1
  • 4Assciation of College & Research Libraries. Standards for Librariesin Higher Education[EB/OL]. [2014-12-11]. http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/standards/standards 一libraries—,pdf. 被引量:1
  • 5Hennen's American Public Library Ratings [EB/OL]. [2014^12-11].http://www.haplr-index.com/HAPLR100.htm. 被引量:1
  • 6Paynter R A. Commercial Library Decision Support Systems: AnAnalysis Based on Collection Managers' NeedsfJ]. CollectionManagement, 2008,34(1):31-47. 被引量:1
  • 7P6rez I J,Cabrerizo F J,Herrera-Viedma E. A Mobile DecisionSupport System for Dynamic Group Decision-Making Problems [J].IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A,2010(12):1244-1256. 被引量:1
  • 8William W. Decision Support Databases in Libraries:Three Casesand a Brief Review of Disparate Literatures [J]. Journal ofElectronic Resources Librarianship, 2008,20(1): 16-35. 被引量:1
  • 9教育部高校图工委.普通高等学校图书馆规程(修订)教高[2002]3号[EB/OL]. (2002-02-26)[2014-12-10]. http://www.scal.edu.cn/gczn/sygc. 被引量:1
  • 10教育部高校图工委.全国高职高专院校图书馆建设指南(征求意见稿)[EB/OL]. (2012-02-22)[2014-12-10]. http://www.scal.edu.cn/gczn/gzzn/gzgzjs/201202221404. 被引量:1

引证文献6

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部