期刊文献+

论史蒂夫·富勒的科学治理思想 被引量:1

On Steve Fuller's Thought about the Governance of Science
下载PDF
导出
摘要 史蒂夫·富勒的科学治理思想包括科学治理的思想逻辑、现实指向及实现路径三个层面。其思想逻辑层面呈现从开放社会的犯错权到共和主义理想的链条,现实指向层面主要针对大科学与精英主义的改进,实现路径层面指向科学的世俗化与民主化。富勒的科学治理思想重塑了科学发现与社会参与的互动关系,对大学建设具有重要的启示意义,但其科学共和主义思想过于理想化。 Steve Fuller's ideas of the governance of science include three aspects : the thought line, the reality aim , and reaching way about the governance of science. The first aspect takes on a logical link from the right to be wrong in open society to the republicanism ideals. The second aspect focuses on the improvement of big science and its elit- ism. The third aspect directs to secularization and democratization of science. Steve Fuller's ideas of the governance of science remodel the interaction between scientific discovery and mass participation, and that make a major enlight- enment to the development of the university. Meanwhile, Fuller's Republicanism ideas are too idealized in the real world.
出处 《北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版)》 2013年第5期1-5,26,共6页 Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics:Social Sciences edition Edition
关键词 史蒂夫·富勒 科学治理 共和主义 Steve Fuller the governance of science republicanism
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献27

  • 1Don Ihde. Technoscience and the 'Other' Continental Philosophy[ J], Continental Philosophy Review ,2000 (33). 被引量:1
  • 2西斯蒙多,许为民,孟强等译.科学技术学导论[M].上海:上海世纪出版集团,2007. 被引量:9
  • 3Robert Rosenberger. Catching up with Technoscience Studies[ J], Human Studies, 2006 (29). 被引量:1
  • 4The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies[ C ], third edition, edited by Edward J. Hackett, Olga Amsterdamska, Michael Lynch, Judy Wajcman, The MIT Press, London, 2008. 被引量:1
  • 5俞可平.治理与善治[M].北京:社会科学科学文献出版社,2002,2,4.130. 被引量:32
  • 6.Select Committee on Science and Technology.科学与社会[M].北京:北京理工大学出版社,.57-58,77. 被引量:1
  • 7European Commission. Science and Society Action Plan[ R ]. 2002. 被引量:1
  • 8S Jasanoff. Science and governance: the US experience[ J ]. The IPTS Report on Science & Governance,2000,54(6). 被引量:1
  • 9The British Council. Science and society: towards a democratic science[ R]. 2001.3. 被引量:1
  • 10N Morris. Vial bodies: conflicting in the move to new institutional relationship in biological medicines research and regulation [ J ]. Research Policy,2000,29 ( 2 ) :2. 被引量:1

共引文献41

引证文献1

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部