摘要
目的观察比较酸放散和传统热放散在新生儿A BO溶血病检测中的应用效果。方法共收集344例新生儿血标本,同时进行酸放散和热放散试验,比较两者的差异及其与临床诊断的吻合度。结果酸放散阳性112例,阴性232例:热放散阳性112例,阴性232例。酸放散与热放散试验间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论对于新生儿ABO溶血病的诊断,酸放散与传统热放散试验的检测效果并无差别,且酸放散试验不受主观因素影响,缩短试验时间,不需要特殊的加热振荡水浴箱,值得推广。
Objective To compare the effect of acid elution and traditional neat radiate in detection of neonatal ABO hemolytic disease, to select the ideal elution method. Methods To collect a total of 344 cases of neonatal blood samples, acid elution and thermal elution test, and to compare the differences and the agreement with the clinical diagnosis. Result Acid elution was positive in 112 cases ,negative in 232 cases ,positive in 112 cases with heat radiate, negative in 232 cases. No significant difference between the acid elution and thermal elution test （P〉0.05）. Conclusion For the diagnosis of neonatal ABO hemolytic disease, there is no difference between the effect of acid elution and detection of the traditional thermal elution test , and acid elution test is not subjective,the test time is shorter,and it does not require special heating oscillating water bath, it is worth promoting.
出处
《临床输血与检验》
CAS
2013年第4期349-350,共2页
Journal of Clinical Transfusion and Laboratory Medicine
