期刊文献+

冠心病多支病变合并糖尿病患者PCI与CABG术长期治疗效果的Meta分析 被引量:9

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较冠心病多支病变合并糖尿病患者经皮冠状动脉支架植入术(PCI)与冠脉旁路移植术(CABG)长期治疗效果。方法通过计算机检索Cochrane Library、PubMed、EMBASE、MEDLINE、中国学术期刊全文数据库,并检索纳入文献的参考文献,收集有关冠心病多支病变合并糖尿病患者以PCI与CABG为治疗方案的随机对照试验及观察对照实验,检索时段为1990年1月—2012年12月。由两位评价者预先制定的纳入标准独立选择文献、提取资料和评价纳入研究的方法学质量,根据纳入相关研究,从中提取有关患者的死亡率(mortality)、联合终点(死亡、脑卒中、心肌梗死)、再次血运重建率。并利用RevMans.5.0软件进行Meta分析。结果共纳入8个对比研究,合计5 567例患者,PCI组2 800例,其中CABG组2 767例,Meta分析结果显示,PCI组死亡率高于CABG组,但两组间差异无统计学意义[OR=1.13,95%CI(0.93,1.38),P=0.22],联合终点(死亡、脑卒中、心肌梗死)事件PCI组高于CABG组,但两组间差异无统计学意义[OR=0.99,95%CI(0.64,1.52),P=0.96],CABG组再次血运重建率显著低于PCI组,两组间差异有统计学意义[OR=4.71,95%CI(3.61,6.16),P<0.000 01]。结论支架植入时代,对于冠心病多支病变合并糖尿病的患者,接受PCI治疗仍然是安全有效的。
机构地区 山西省汾阳医院
出处 《中西医结合心脑血管病杂志》 2013年第10期1164-1166,共3页 Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine on Cardio-Cerebrovascular Disease
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Pauln RS,Whady AH, Pedro AI., et al. Coronary revascularization (surgical or percutaneous) decreases mortality after the first year in diabetic subjects but not in nondiabetic subjects with muhivessel disease: An analysis from the medicine, angioplasty, or surgery study (MASS II )[J]. Circulation,2006 ,114(SupplI) :420 - 424. 被引量:1
  • 2Booth J, Clayton T, Pepper J, et al. Randomized, controlled trial of coronary artery bypass surgery versus percutaneous coronary in- tervention in patients with mult/vessel coronary artery disease six - year follow - up from the stent or surgery trial (SoS)[J]. Circula tion,2008,118:381 - 388. 被引量:1
  • 3Rodriguez AE,Baldi J,Pereira CF,et al. Five year follow- up of the argentine randomized trial of coronary angioplasty with stent ing versus coronary bypass surgery in patients with multiple vessel disease (ERACI ]])[J]. J Am Coil Cardiol,2005,46(4):582 - 588. 被引量:1
  • 4Serruys PW, Andrew TL, van Herwerden LA, et al. Five- year outcomes after coronary stenting versus bypass surgery for the treatment of multivessel disease: The final analysis of the arterial revascularization therapies study (ARTS) randomized trial [J]. J Am Coll Cardiol,2005,46(4) :575 - 581. 被引量:1
  • 5Kapur A, Bartolini D, Finlay MC, et al. The bypass angioplasty re vascularization in type 1 and 2 diabetes study.. 5 - year follow - up of revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in diabetic patients with multives- sel disease[J]. J Cardiovase Med,2010,11(1) :26 - 33. 被引量:1
  • 6Park DW,Kim YH. Long - term outcome of stents versus bypass surgery in diabetic and nondiabetie patients with multivessel or left main coronary artery disease[J]. Circ Cardiovasc Interv, 2012,5: 467 - 475. 被引量:1
  • 7Kim YG, Park DW, Park GM. Influence of diabetes mellitus on long - term (five - year) outcomes of drug - eluting stentsand cor- onary artery bypass grafting for multivessel coronary revascular- ization[J]. Am J Cardiol, 2012,109 : 1548 - 1557. 被引量:1
  • 8Farkouh ME,Dangas G, Leon MB, et al. Design of the future re- vaseularization evaluation in patients with diabetes mellitus: Opti- mal management of multivessel disease (FREEDOM) trial [J]. Am Heart J,2008,155:215-223. 被引量:1
  • 9Farkouh ME, Domanski M, Sleepcr LA, et al. Strategies for mul tivessel revascularization in patients with Diabetes[J]. N Engl J Med,2012,367(25) :2375 - 2384. 被引量:1
  • 10Banning AP, Westaby S, Morice MC, el al. Diabetic and nondia- betic patients with left main and/or 3 - vessel coronary artery dis ease:Comparison of outcomes with cardiac surgery and paclitaxel- eluting stents[J]. J Am Coil Cardiol,2010,55:1067- 1075. 被引量:1

同被引文献89

引证文献9

二级引证文献41

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部