摘要
我国法中无拟制婚姻制度,几乎造成错误处理重婚案件中的诚信当事人的案例。拟制婚姻制度发源于罗马法,以保护有诚信当事人的无效婚姻中的子女为目的,该制度在中世纪被教会法按同样的目的重拾,经过世俗学者的加工,它发展为既保护无效婚姻中的诚信当事人,也保护他们的子女的制度。在这一制度之旁,有保护无效婚姻的无过失方的制度,但巴西和意大利的立法者逐渐认识到无过失与诚信的差异,都同时规定对无效婚姻中的诚信方和无过失方的保护。我国《婚姻法》既无对无效婚姻中诚信方的保护,也无对无过失方的保护,是为必须填补的法律漏洞。
There is no institution of putative marriage in China＇s laws and this situation almost causes wrong cases that the interested parties in good faith in bigamous marriages maybe handled erroneously. The in- stitution of putative marriage originated in Roman law was to protect the children of interested parties in good faith in invalid marriages. This institution was revived by canonic law for the same purpose in the Middle A- ges. Through the processing of secular scholars, it has been developed to protect both interested parties in good faith and their children in invalid marriages. Next to this institution, there is the institution for protecting non- fault parties in invalid marriages. However, the lawmakers in Brazil and Italy come to realize the differences between non-fauh and the good faith, they thus establish the protections for both the interested parties in good faith and non-fault parties in invalid marriages. In China, the Marriage Law of the People＇s Republic of China protects neither the interested parties in good faith nor non-fauh parties in invalid marriages, and this loophole thus must be solved.
出处
《中国法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第5期137-149,共13页
China Legal Science
