摘要
目的:比较高血压病脑出血微创清除术与开颅手术的效果差异,探讨微创清除术的临床价值。方法:230例脑出血患者按照随机数字法分观察组及对照组各115例,两组基础治疗相同,对照组实施常规开颅手术,实施微创血肿清除术。结果:观察组手术时间、术中出血量、手术后并发症低于对照组;两组患者手术后1个月进行治疗效果观察,观察组总有效与对照组比较,差异无显著意义(P>0.05)。结论:微创穿刺治疗脑出血是一种有效治疗手段,简便易行、副损伤小、对患者的耐受要求低、费用低廉、操作简单。
Objective：Compare hypertension cerebral hemorrhage minimally invasive removal technique and the effect of craniotomy differences,to explore the clinical value of minimally invasive of operation.Method：230 cases of cerebral hemorrhage were randomly divided into the observation group and the control group each 115 cases,two patients were given the same basic treatment,patients in control group received conventional craniotomy operation,the implementation of minimally invasive hematoma.Result：The observation group operation time,intraoperative amount of bleeding after urgical complications lower than those of the control group;after operation 1 month.treatment effect of the observation group and control group is no significant difference（P＆lt;0.05）.Conclusion：Minimally invasive puncture treatment of cerebral hemorrhage is a kind of effective treatment means,simple operation,less injury,deputy to the patient’s tolerance requirement is low,the cost is low,the operation is simple,and can be widely used in hospitals at all levels.
出处
《中国医药导刊》
2013年第7期1160-1160,1162,共2页
Chinese Journal of Medicinal Guide
关键词
高血压病
脑出血
微创清除术
开颅手术
Hypertension disease
Cerebral hemorrhage
Minimally invasive removal technique
Craniotomy
