摘要
巴塞尔资本协议作为"跨国监管网络"的典范,理应具有政治中立的特点,但实证研究表明,不论是资本协议Ⅰ、资本协议Ⅱ,还是新近推出的资本协议Ⅲ,都深受国际关系和大国政治的影响,其本质上还是政治博弈的产物。各国对资本协议实施水平参差不齐,概与国内政治环境、经济发展水平和金融监管环境密切相关。作为发展中国家和经济转型期的中国,宜对资本协议Ⅲ的实施采取理性审慎的态度,实施的程度和步伐应与国内监管环境相适应,防止对中国银行的中长期盈利性和国际竞争力带来负面影响。
The Basel Ⅲ Framework, hailed as an example of Transnational Regulatory Network（TRN）, is supposed to be politically neutral and its distributionless regulatory coordination shall benefit the international community as a whole. However, empirical studies show that the Basel Ⅲ is deeply subject to international relations and the power＇ s political pressure just as did the Basel Ⅰ /Ⅱ. The degree of implementation varies considerably in different countries, in align with their domestic political and regulatory environments. As a developing country and the largest transitional economy, China shall maintain a rational and scrupulous attitude towards Basel Ill and the way of implementation shall be in proportionate to China＇s regulatory environment. Pursuit of the quickly-changing high norms can be hazardous to the profitability and international competitiveness of Chinese banks in the long run.
出处
《国际商务研究》
北大核心
2013年第5期87-96,共10页
International Business Research
基金
教育部人文社会科学研究基金规划项目"金融危机后贸易保护主义的应对:从国际金融法的视角"(10YJA820031)
